Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Re: 1.8.16 up for signing/testing
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
References: 
 <CAP_GPNh2KR4=p-nNHWdf8Uoq6a4j=KRWtshQ74ZgE2W_E3qa3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <39c71279-e465-ce90-81ee-92a9701eee14@posteo.de>
 <571F14B7.2000301@apache.org>
 <CAB84uBXnymLJFnwmxR4AnK5fPseg_MdM_7rT7r0GHp0WVyZVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <571F29A4.4040302@apache.org>
From: Stefan Hett <stefan@egosoft.com>
Message-ID: <f026769d-5407-3980-3c44-11fea987ac9e@egosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:26:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <571F29A4.4040302@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------940353D6D5DDBA2FCB927B6F"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------940353D6D5DDBA2FCB927B6F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 4/26/2016 10:41 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.04.2016 10:09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Branko Čibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 26.04.2016 03:48, Stefan wrote:
>>>> On 4/21/2016 18:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>>>>> The 1.8.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>>>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>>>> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on April 28th
>>>>> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by April 27th.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>> Verified integrity and file content against 1.8.16-tag in the SVN
>>>> repository.
>>> Did you also build the sources and run the tests? It's sort of expected.
>> I think it's fine as long as Stefan states explicitly what he has
>> verified (which he has). It's an additional assurance from someone
>> that says "I state that the tarball corresponds to the tag and the
>> branch". It doesn't count for a +1 vote for our "3 votes per platform"
>> rule, but that's fine
> Yup, and this is why I asked. :) It may not be a binding vote but it's
> useful to know about any passing tests on Windows, IMO.
As Johan confirmed, I only verified the integrity of the zip archives 
this time.
Since I wasn't too sure whether that's useful, I asked on IRC before and 
Daniel stated that as long as it's explicitly stated, it's ok (and to a 
certain degree useful :) ).

Just wasn't able to get the testing process done in time for these 
versions, since I was lacking the time here to finish that by tomorrow 
(already spent all the time I could invest to set up the PGP keys and 
read through all the related documentation - not only Apache but also 
GnuPG/GPG4Win).
That said, since all of that is done now, I'm aiming to have a full 
Windows test setup-up up and running for the next version.

-- 
Regards,
Stefan Hett


--------------940353D6D5DDBA2FCB927B6F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/26/2016 10:41 AM, Branko Čibej
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:571F29A4.4040302@apache.org" type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">On 26.04.2016 10:09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Branko Čibej <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:brane@apache.org">&lt;brane@apache.org&gt;</a> wrote:
</pre>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <pre wrap="">On 26.04.2016 03:48, Stefan wrote:
</pre>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <pre wrap="">On 4/21/2016 18:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
</pre>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <pre wrap="">The 1.8.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
   <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion">https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion</a>
and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on April 28th
so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by April 27th.

Thanks!

</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <pre wrap="">Verified integrity and file content against 1.8.16-tag in the SVN
repository.
</pre>
          </blockquote>
          <pre wrap="">Did you also build the sources and run the tests? It's sort of expected.
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <pre wrap="">I think it's fine as long as Stefan states explicitly what he has
verified (which he has). It's an additional assurance from someone
that says "I state that the tarball corresponds to the tag and the
branch". It doesn't count for a +1 vote for our "3 votes per platform"
rule, but that's fine
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Yup, and this is why I asked. :) It may not be a binding vote but it's
useful to know about any passing tests on Windows, IMO.
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    As Johan confirmed, I only verified the integrity of the zip
    archives this time.<br>
    Since I wasn't too sure whether that's useful, I asked on IRC before
    and Daniel stated that as long as it's explicitly stated, it's ok
    (and to a certain degree useful :) ).<br>
    <br>
    Just wasn't able to get the testing process done in time for these
    versions, since I was lacking the time here to finish that by
    tomorrow (already spent all the time I could invest to set up the
    PGP keys and read through all the related documentation - not only
    Apache but also GnuPG/GPG4Win).<br>
    That said, since all of that is done now, I'm aiming to have a full
    Windows test setup-up up and running for the next version.<br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Regards,
Stefan Hett</pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------940353D6D5DDBA2FCB927B6F--