subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Hett <>
Subject Re: 1.8.16 up for signing/testing
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:26:40 GMT
On 4/26/2016 10:41 AM, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> On 26.04.2016 10:09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Branko ─îibej <> wrote:
>>> On 26.04.2016 03:48, Stefan wrote:
>>>> On 4/21/2016 18:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>>>>> The 1.8.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>>>> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on April 28th
>>>>> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by April 27th.
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Verified integrity and file content against 1.8.16-tag in the SVN
>>>> repository.
>>> Did you also build the sources and run the tests? It's sort of expected.
>> I think it's fine as long as Stefan states explicitly what he has
>> verified (which he has). It's an additional assurance from someone
>> that says "I state that the tarball corresponds to the tag and the
>> branch". It doesn't count for a +1 vote for our "3 votes per platform"
>> rule, but that's fine
> Yup, and this is why I asked. :) It may not be a binding vote but it's
> useful to know about any passing tests on Windows, IMO.
As Johan confirmed, I only verified the integrity of the zip archives 
this time.
Since I wasn't too sure whether that's useful, I asked on IRC before and 
Daniel stated that as long as it's explicitly stated, it's ok (and to a 
certain degree useful :) ).

Just wasn't able to get the testing process done in time for these 
versions, since I was lacking the time here to finish that by tomorrow 
(already spent all the time I could invest to set up the PGP keys and 
read through all the related documentation - not only Apache but also 
That said, since all of that is done now, I'm aiming to have a full 
Windows test setup-up up and running for the next version.

Stefan Hett

View raw message