Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFEC718B37 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98657 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2016 21:44:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 98596 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2016 21:44:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 98582 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2016 21:44:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:44:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E152FC002C; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:44:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Quarantine-ID: <47U6S5JDMblW> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam_report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.43 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.329, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=tmatesoft.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47U6S5JDMblW; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.tmatesoft.com (lists.tmatesoft.com [72.9.228.230]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9F8CA5F1EF; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:44:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tmatesoft.com; s=mail; h=Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=n4QZrYVxtuaqgcUYV6cUoLR2YfSXZynEYGoqMgIBnkc=; b=N5E+ygbaq6ulGTFDrcMfPLVZVcxhpNQs7hAJCcdtxdRgqdR24IoPFrwkNhf8LvbMs2patNpAuSPKjh92hERxTbJf4VWFGCxo8XV9/5uRKP7uDUnXt7f0Xfm6E7vinUXbfnjBJ+7ZeVruCOtcqojkwe3qtaEoCbPgOt2YTK2BAqw=; Received: from ip-89-176-112-10.net.upcbroadband.cz ([89.176.112.10] helo=dmit10.localnet) by www.tmatesoft.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1adPQh-0005x5-CX; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:44:36 +0000 From: Dmitry Pavlenko To: Branko =?utf-8?q?=C4=8Cibej?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make constructors of JavaHL classes public Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:40:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org References: <201603081735.19635.pavlenko@tmatesoft.com> <56DF4415.3040406@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <56DF4415.3040406@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201603082240.56350.pavlenko@tmatesoft.com> X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "www.tmatesoft.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes, it would be enough, thanks! > On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > > Hello! > > I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be > > possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do > > that > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3C2 > > 01309041617.25159.pavlenko@tmatesoft.com%3E > > > > and I'm asking you to do that once again. > > Would it work for you if we make the constructors package-scope instead > of public? You'd still be able to create the objects in your > implementation; but the user-facing API really shouldn't allow object > creation in these cases. > > -- Brane [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Yes, it would be enough, thanks! > On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > > Hello! > > I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be > > possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do > > that > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3C2 > > 01309041617.25159.pavlenko@tmatesoft.com%3E > > > > and I'm asking you to do that once again. > > Would it work for you if we make the constructors package-scope instead > of public? You'd still be able to create the objects in your > implementation; but the user-facing API really shouldn't allow object > creation in these cases. > > -- Brane