Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35C0317BE9 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74289 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2014 14:37:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 74235 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2014 14:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 74225 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2014 14:37:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:37:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markphip@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:37:09 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wp18so400112obc.5 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IXSeGKyoQFhvDllTh58UA/Ov5gZQw6a9KaR+pmsjFYE=; b=pcFtqUgnOtG6CvmtAhq4RUkBoQUbQHl8IHNmSzRfWK4duz+Tcv3YHBjyZUvFSbQ6gc jKQCBZt2dJ6nLTfguUUksVgNJqYJGAjJ2yy2oiUBTb11YicDlZ61wJxNzKEhB6/mt0v5 Q4GxI5ee9xtcAJRlBBOx9wRhO4j+Xha5Jf/vzWuxrptEOE9XAlx5wr5u8JSQmScuQtfs QfjgXcjxvg0DGfr3HT8Ir7RXNval9HBqm+OPR9oaO+is48KSHj4j+XqzCVubLpWQUliO juBwR5902DurO/H5Wd9KqdknwNX03Rq55Cdoo6hOyWtHYxSx/4UTplqtT8d5Lo4osw6E bRYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.96.202 with SMTP id du10mr57216664obb.9.1412174208629; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.22.80 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761g3lwe9.fsf@ntlworld.com> References: <87sijeda7h.fsf@ntlworld.com> <5427CDF0.2010205@wandisco.com> <87k34mrbii.fsf@ntlworld.com> <5429A12F.9080306@wandisco.com> <542B068F.4030906@gmx.de> <87a95gkqux.fsf_-_@ntlworld.com> <542BFC6D.7000204@gmail.com> <8761g3lwe9.fsf@ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:36:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [serf-dev] serf errors on responses bigger than 4GB From: Mark Phippard To: Philip Martin Cc: "C. Michael Pilato" , serf-dev@googlegroups.com, Andreas Stieger , Subversion Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e44c211230705045d6ece X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b2e44c211230705045d6ece Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > "C. Michael Pilato" writes: > > > The log message for r2419 mentions "files" larger than 4Gb, and leads me > > to believe that this problem only affects GETs. But here, Philip avoids > > the term "files" and talks about the "compressed size". Does the bug > > fixed in r2419 manifest on any response > 4GB, such as a bulk-mode > > REPORT carrying a whole Subversion tree that's larger than 4GB? > > I can trigger the decompression error on a 5GB REPORT by setting > http-bulk-updates=yes on the client side. > > This does not really answer the question. Was your REPORT 5GB because it had a single file > 4GB or because it had tens of thousands of small files? Mike's question is about the latter. Does Serf only fail when decompressing a single large file, or also if the entire REPORT response happens to be > 4 GB? The latter probably would be a much more common problem to run into if it can happen. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ --047d7b2e44c211230705045d6ece Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Philip Martin <philip.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@gmail.com> writes:

> The log message for r2419 mentions "files" larger than 4Gb, = and leads me
> to believe that this problem only affects GETs.=C2=A0 But here, Philip= avoids
> the term "files" and talks about the "compressed size&q= uot;.=C2=A0 Does the bug
> fixed in r2419 manifest on any response > 4GB, such as a bulk-mode<= br> > REPORT carrying a whole Subversion tree that's larger than 4GB?
I can trigger the decompression error on a 5GB REPORT by setting
http-bulk-updates=3Dyes on the client side.


This does not really answer the question.

Was your REPORT 5GB because it had a single file > 4GB or because it ha= d tens of thousands of small files?=C2=A0 Mike's question is about the = latter.

Does Serf only fail when decompressing a s= ingle large file, or also if the entire REPORT response happens to be > = 4 GB?=C2=A0 The latter probably would be a much more common problem to run = into if it can happen.=C2=A0

--
Thanks

Mark Phipp= ard
http://markphip.blogspot.c= om/
--047d7b2e44c211230705045d6ece--