Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2322610652 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48717 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 22:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 48671 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 22:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 48664 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2013 22:30:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:30:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:30:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e49so711289eek.20 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xgmQraHQYxyIn4fe0QzlvMpZVok+VcMwQw6Oopa/Yww=; b=T9sxupeojaC+7ComBd44XktA+qwDfqa4TzHtkvnosiiWYBRCtznhyVLr46hvb/hK/P AX1OL8OSxqiPtY8QeWqyAJjbXagZCLj6ONJ/OanQgS1lZN+OFNv9aw0m9yGgDEpO2JJ+ 5NxCTa3QAHunqMEeytGaoaTRs0qUI0uV2ZXI8aNjExSCBIV5N6lBg9qEXGbqgF/u+v1N TS/E/3Ue2ln2Jc+SKsXhiqcLhI7LB2ITuoZ/JwuPv1oJVADZMPCMmm8mA26O8GWBzg/G ncIiYb6PXRoA9ruoVFllBRPu5n/12P93NXCgGI3nv16a2kV8omxJUJhvqIXrr4SPEm8D eo1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.184.112 with SMTP id et16mr8456014wic.58.1370471383719; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.89.103 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.89.103 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51AB03A7.80004@apache.org> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:29:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Media-Type for SVNPubSub From: Greg Stein To: Ben Reser Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=C4=8Cibej?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2269a0065cc04de6fbc9a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2269a0065cc04de6fbc9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jun 5, 2013 6:21 PM, "Ben Reser" wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Branko =C4=8Cibej w= rote: > >>> or even better, > >>> > >>> application/vnd.apache.vc-notify+json > >>> > >>> as the format of the notifications does not in fact imply any kind of > >>> publish/subscribe architecture. You could create a server which clients > >> > >> Ooh. I like that one. +1 > > > > Going with this. > > Committed in r1490045 and nominated form backport to 1.8.x. I'll take > care of the registration once I finish writing up the specification, > which won't likely be until after the hackathon since I'd rather > concentrate on other things during the hackathon. There's no reason > to wait on starting to use it for the registration. Agreed. Thanks! --001a11c2269a0065cc04de6fbc9a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jun 5, 2013 6:21 PM, "Ben Reser" <ben@reser.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> or even better,
> >>>
> >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 application/vnd.apache.vc-notify+json
> >>>
> >>> as the format of the notifications does not in fact imply= any kind of
> >>> publish/subscribe architecture. You could create a server= which clients
> >>
> >> Ooh. I like that one. +1
> >
> > Going with this.
>
> Committed in r1490045 and nominated form backport to 1.8.x. =C2=A0I= 9;ll take
> care of the registration once I finish writing up the specification, > which won't likely be until after the hackathon since I'd rath= er
> concentrate on other things during the hackathon. =C2=A0There's no= reason
> to wait on starting to use it for the registration.

Agreed. Thanks!

--001a11c2269a0065cc04de6fbc9a--