Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51274 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2011 19:14:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2011 19:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 81090 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 19:14:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 81046 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 19:14:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 81038 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2011 19:14:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:14:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcorvel@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.171] (HELO mail-iy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.210.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:14:40 +0000 Received: by iyj21 with SMTP id 21so11841353iyj.16 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UR//K+bdSc+O8pOr29yDnEYah+BEAmoRkDMdqKm7U/M=; b=ZgM59XVB2ARRkv+IaYP4rRsfDCLuccIhpUJKSck6pw6WXxelXPbjQvwFQiy2jyUMuv rQXEkp15at59Na4Bq65RV3WI5zeCcbaCphnz0ZqFb3+npuYSErmkAleXBon2xZ5CaZ0m BfNuEl+eqex4vu0VIboHqN7/CbNYuIi28p4rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fwHM/W638kmsP1fzy6hPtUXlDIsZRcA7ne+RRH4t2KBlESzknIOo73SzGgYdxnHoyw tJxMo+SpfK4VZnnb4hraRwq0KZCBuNE4Kvh+w9FAnreXt5wfbnxKXIHxvUNdIWdu7j+Y i7XCQGxjtEFsWJ9CIP45t+gxKSyEnT9xvUj4E= Received: by 10.231.17.203 with SMTP id t11mr3521618iba.141.1293995660186; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 11:14:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.14.75 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 11:13:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110102183616.GA21078@daniel3.local> References: <20110102183616.GA21078@daniel3.local> From: Johan Corveleyn Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: -bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan, > > I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. =A0When > I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't > appear when I ran it with a trunk build. =A0(See attached transcript.) Did you do that with a build of HEAD of diff-optimizations-bytes (i.e. only changes to diff2 behavior)? Or with a build where the patch for diff3 was applied? Johan > Furthermore, the conflict resolution (a) marked all the head of the file > as conflict (which is wrong; line 49 did change, but the first > 20-something lines are identical), and (b) deleted everything after > line 232. > > I realize that (a) is an outstanding issue (discussed in another thread > this weekend), but I don't recall that (b) is a known issue. > > Daniel > >