Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-struts-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 70648 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2002 21:06:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2002 21:06:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 18317 invoked by uid 97); 1 Apr 2002 21:05:48 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-struts-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18274 invoked by uid 97); 1 Apr 2002 21:05:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list struts-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18195 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2002 21:05:46 -0000 X-Lotus-FromDomain: NATIONAL LEASING GROUP From: Jeff_Mychasiw@nlgroup.ca To: struts-user@jakarta.apache.org Message-ID: <86256B8E.00738F58.00@mail2.nlgroup.ca> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:02:12 -0600 Subject: Struts and Tapestry Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I done a search in this list and it did not bring up any old debates :) It seems like a neat framework. I am still a new struts user , so I would like to ask what some of the technical reason for using Struts over Tapestry?. Struts fits in very well with our company because we have an existing JSP app and Struts seems like a natural progression from where we are and we are able to do it one piece at a time. I like struts myself but I know there will be a debate here at the office so any information would be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: