Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6510200B7E for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C35FD160ACB; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A8C5F160AA9 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:13:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 45957 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2016 17:13:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@storm.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@storm.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@storm.apache.org Received: (qmail 45938 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2016 17:13:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:13:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 132C51A7B3D; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:13:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LINEPADDING=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wL5PrWdqTB4n; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com (mail-lf0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 359C15FBC7; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u14so28497590lfd.1; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1O6Ab6SOcNJWjZPEQfgiIkRtg4Ee7quhUYhZGVpQ+h8=; b=IIPwSVkSyfN7W4KFsvybmnI020UOAdx7Hh/QTK548kVgsyhFW1+MFTKfz6WzJ8J0OP IEnXI7rQ4vbGS+XCQTIL6x/rLyK9IzzAFpv9GSg/iuI6w4NEITMVcnai64g6ukQG9v/s V6VQKK7oI/wD0aroL11/skMPP5wsMzA4q4/ZU3VxVXrwkTDFn+NbzHIEihHcfiBxMg0x +R3bB3bRuAlwKSMhY2Hel07avU7NokJjrrApAsIJv1UbnZnAa/hC54FmSY+aeaaN74pZ HVG6u25hOsECjKTbKJEB6iDOLo+gpVeacvs9H9oS5CpdWMAmu/2oF2wwyF8YSEnLKJRk nezQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1O6Ab6SOcNJWjZPEQfgiIkRtg4Ee7quhUYhZGVpQ+h8=; b=K0uV+1K8LVHfWCk1cB83HR7ksLcVJOOYsmV+z8tARwoJPDJPfsw2KkyQMU7ooMdJKW 6lx2u2XmWT92yZz0DTilrAsBOxFC7UiWRnIWUEVQCOyuapDZ6HsLIxGuUl6Fv1NP0eXt KxAPik5AcBwyYoK6Upq4OVBavj7Fqry3QJQunBYpUgYmF63aydMfD4F5Wkt96Y28GF9x WjITBYdhZqiIccjFyPYEGgJvR4ux8fEG0GhPO2ss2n2TXFmECnMuvqpHodsjiBA97Xw3 qOyhXsgs85hDgEhKVqf7wfSqPZ9TqI6PBZwGiTRO/pNnAQLy+sos3iRLIbYpDOeLgqwP nqFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPXJ6kP6qoskQBB1jSgbm9yZZZaNstPRNTXe7Cgn/7Ob/soe1RSSMeJpNqTx93DTq6maruZPsvv8WR4Sw== X-Received: by 10.25.83.16 with SMTP id h16mr12670896lfb.37.1473182027410; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:13:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.151.20 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:13:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1697793442.379470.1473172645122@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1416436614.202502.1473147852890.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1416436614.202502.1473147852890@mail.yahoo.com> <1294426241.252341.1473155446299@mail.yahoo.com> <1697793442.379470.1473172645122@mail.yahoo.com> From: Rajasekhar Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:13:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Max supervisor slots To: user@storm.apache.org, Walid Aljoby Cc: Manu Zhang , "dev@storm.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114156986ef55c053bd9eb02 archived-at: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:13:59 -0000 --001a114156986ef55c053bd9eb02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi walid, you can set no.of workers per topology, in your case it is 2. you have 4 typologies and each one has 2 i.e 8 worker slots required to run 4 typologies. Do you have enough worker slots ? How many supervisor instances are running ? How many workers in total ? You can find this information in STORM UI. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Walid Aljoby wrote: > Hi Manu, > > I do not need more slots because the topology I am running is only three > executors. > However, Is it possible to set number of slots/supervisor to be more than > four to run as an example more than four typologies. > > > Thanks > -- > WA > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Manu Zhang > *To:* Walid Aljoby ; "user@storm.apache.org" < > user@storm.apache.org>; "dev@storm.apache.org" > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 6, 2016 6:43 PM > > *Subject:* Re: Max supervisor slots > > Do you have more required slots than available ? Topologies do not share > slots in storm. > > Manu > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:50 PM Walid Aljoby > wrote: > > Hi Manu, > Number of workers is only two per topology. > Thanks--WA From: Manu Zhang > To: Walid Aljoby ; User ; > "dev@storm.apache.org" > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 5:32 PM > Subject: Re: Max supervisor slots > > Hi Walid, > What's the number of workers you set for each topology ? > Manu > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:44 PM Walid Aljoby > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > I have a question please about the maximum typologies that can be > processed by Apache storm production cluster? > Although the number of slots per supervisor is four(6700,6701,6702,6703), > but when I submitted four typologies, I noted only three were running in > parallel, while one of the typologies does not assigned to any worker. So I > was wondering if someone help why slot 6703 does not appear to be active in > the cluster.. > Thanks and Regards, > --WA > > > > > > > > -- Thanks & Regards Rajasekhar --001a114156986ef55c053bd9eb02 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi walid,

you can set no.of wo= rkers per topology, in your case it is 2. you have 4 typologies and each on= e has 2 i.e 8 worker slots required to run 4 typologies.
Do you ha= ve enough worker slots ? How many supervisor instances are running ? How ma= ny workers in total ?
You can find this information in STORM UI.<= br>

On Tue, = Sep 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com><= /span> wrote:
Hi Manu,

I do not need more slots because the topology I am running is only= three executors.=C2=A0
However, Is it possible to se= t number of slots/supervisor to be more than four to run as an example more= than four typologies.=C2=A0


Thanks
--
WA


=
From: Manu Zhang <owenzhang1990@gmail.com>
To: Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com>; &= quot;user@storm.= apache.org" <user@storm.apache.org>; "dev@storm.apache.org" <dev@storm.apache.org>=
Sent: Tuesday, Septemb= er 6, 2016 6:43 PM

Subject: Re: Max supervisor slots

Do you have more re= quired slots than available ? Topologies do not share slots in storm.
<= br clear=3D"none">
Manu=C2=A0

=
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:50 PM Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com.invali= d> wrote:
Hi Manu,
Number of workers is only two per topology.
Thanks--WA=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 From: Manu Zhang <owenz= hang1990@gmail.com>
=C2=A0To: Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com>;= User <user@storm.apache.org>; "dev@storm.apache.org" <dev@storm.apache.org>
=C2=A0Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 5:32 PM
=C2=A0Subject: Re: Max supervisor slots

Hi Walid,
What's the number of workers you set for each topology ?
Manu
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:44 PM Walid Aljoby <walid_al= joby@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hi Everyone,
I have a question please about the maximum typologies that can be processed= by Apache storm production cluster?
Although the number of slots per supervisor is four(6700,6701,6702,6703), b= ut when I submitted four typologies, I noted only three were running in par= allel, while one of the typologies does not assigned to any worker.=C2=A0So= I was wondering if someone help why slot 6703 does not appear to be active= in the cluster..
Thanks and Regards,
--WA=C2=A0



=C2=A0 =C2=A0



= --
Thanks & R= egards
Rajasekhar
--001a114156986ef55c053bd9eb02--