Yep! That's correct.
If you implemented your own scheduler, you could write one that gave more control of ports
to the cluster users, but it's not a simple task.
-- Kyle
On Thursday, September 1, 2016 3:35 AM, Richards Peter <hbkrichards@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it the pluggable scheduler that is being discussed here?
http://storm.apache.org/releases/1.0.1/Storm-Scheduler.html
Richards Peter.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Kyle Nusbaum <knusbaum@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
There's no API to do that currently. It's entirely up to the scheduler and will likely stay
that way. I think creating an API to control this sort of thing is a direction we don't want
to go in with Storm. -- Kyle
On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:10 AM, Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Anshu,
Yeah, correct. (6700-6703).
-
Thanks and Best Walid
From: anshu shukla <anshushukla0@gmail.com>
To: user@storm.apache.org; Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: Assignment of threads to tcp ports
By tcp port you mean Supervisor port .
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Walid Aljoby <walid_aljoby@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it easier to specify in which tcp port the tasks (threads) will be assigned?Any API can
help to do that?
Thank You--Regards
--
Thanks & Regards,
Anshu Shukla
|