storm-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rudraneel chakraborty <rudraneel.chakrabo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Need Help regarding topology with numWorker>1
Date Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:58:39 GMT
Topology param numWorkers i meant

On Thursday, 11 February 2016, Rudraneel chakraborty <
rudraneel.chakraborty@gmail.com> wrote:

> More specifically , i have seen a topology performs better if it is
> assigned a single worker compared to more than one worker.
>
> I want a situation where a topology performs better with more than one
> worker.
>
> And it doesnt matter if both workers are on same supervisor or different
> supervisor
>
> On Thursday, 11 February 2016, Matthias J. Sax <mjsax@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mjsax@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>> I am not sure what you mean:
>>
>>   - number of worker slots per supervisor
>> or
>>   - topology parameter "number of workers"
>>
>> Can you clarify?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 02/11/2016 05:14 AM, anshu shukla wrote:
>> > Not  like that..  But i have used workers equal to number of cores. Each
>> > vm with 8 corea.
>> >
>> > On 11 Feb 2016 9:07 am, "Rudraneel chakraborty"
>> > <rudraneel.chakraborty@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:rudraneel.chakraborty@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     more than one worker on same node ? Did u use custom schedule r?
>> >     because by default, the workers would be spread throughout the
>> cluster
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Rudraneel Chakraborty
> Carleton University Real Time and Distributed Systems Reserach
>
>

-- 
Rudraneel Chakraborty
Carleton University Real Time and Distributed Systems Reserach

Mime
View raw message