Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4F2C3DC1.10002@zaripov.kiev.ua>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:04:17 +0200
From: Farid Zaripov <farid@zaripov.kiev.ua>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [disscuss] Retirement of stdcxx to the 'Attic'?
References: <4F2AC1FE.3040604@rowe-clan.net> <4F2AEF3F.9040500@roguewave.com>
 <4F2B14E8.6030401@rowe-clan.net>
 <CALdE9OB2m+UQqiSdJiEpv0b4Aedg1pzo+TuZ=kaieRQ1T8CDiw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALdE9OB2m+UQqiSdJiEpv0b4Aedg1pzo+TuZ=kaieRQ1T8CDiw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 03.02.2012 1:52, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> 2. Someone with stdcxx commit privileges should be part of this 
> reunification (for obvious reasons). It is very discouraging to submit 
> patches knowing full well and ahead of time that they will never make 
> it anywhere. Perhaps the process of submitting patches could be 
> somewhat less of a "process". Just my 0.02. --Stefan 

   Stefan, if you split the all your patches to a set of small finalized 
changes and submit them through a set of corresponding issues in JIRA, I 
promise I will process them all one by one.
At the moment I don't see any issues, reported by you. Sorry, but 
process is a process.

Farid.