Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48527 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2009 22:11:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2009 22:11:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 2798 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2009 22:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 2781 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2009 22:11:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 2770 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2009 22:11:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:11:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:11:39 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LJbBm-0001M2-J1 for dev@stdcxx.apache.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:11:18 -0800 Message-ID: <21282005.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:11:18 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Sebor To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: Outdated nightly builds results on apache.org In-Reply-To: <21269973.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sebor@roguewave.com References: <49428FCB.4030208@gmail.com> <21025075.post@talk.nabble.com> <4947D627.4080909@roguewave.com> <21269973.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org An update on the results: they are now current, but all testsuite builds fail with errors in the Rogue Wave test driver file lockfile.cpp (see below). I've just committed a fix for this error so once it's picked up by the nightly test infrastructure we should start seeing some hopefully more useful build results, probably sometime tomorrow. $(TOPDIR)/tests/src/lockfile.cpp: In destructor 'virtual RWQELockFile::~RWQELockFile()': $(TOPDIR)/tests/src/lockfile.cpp:161: error: 'free' was not declared in this scope $(TOPDIR)/tests/src/lockfile.cpp: In member function 'void RWQELockFile::copyName(const char*)': $(TOPDIR)/tests/src/lockfile.cpp:218: error: 'malloc' was not declared in this scope gmake: *** [lockfile.o] Error 1 Martin Sebor wrote: > > > Andrew Black-5 wrote: >> >> Greetings Martin >> >> I took a glance at the logs for the 4.2.x exports, and observe the >> following error message: >> >> /usr/bin/scp: Argument list too long >> >> This particular message is generated when the exporter script attempts >> to copy the generated files out to Apache. The solution as I see it >> will be to manually perform the export, splitting the export list into >> pieces to avoid overloading scp. You'll then need to manually update >> the cache file as is done at the end of static_export.sh. >> >> > > It turns out that cleaning out the $HOME/.stdcxx-cache/4.2.x directory > and re-running the $HOME/bin/pubres.sh script fixed the problem. There > were over 30,000 files in the directory, nearly half of them empty. All > the empty ones were from sometime in September. There still are a bunch > of them in $HOME/.stdcxx-cache/4.3.x although not nearly as many. > > I'm in the process of running $HOME/bin/mkxviews on people.apache.org > now. When it's done and when the Web server picks up the changes the > 4.2.x results should be up to date. Let's keep an eye on the results > page over the next few days to make sure the problem is gone: > > http://stdcxx.apache.org/builds/4.2.x/ > > > >> >> --Andrew Black >> >> Martin Sebor wrote: >>> The page has been updated but it looks like all the builds are stale >>> (33 days old). Let me see if I can find the time to figure out what's >>> going on tomorrow. If not, I'm travelling starting Wednesday so it >>> might need to wait until the 26th. >>> >>> >>> Martin Sebor-2 wrote: >>>> Farid Zaripov wrote: >>>>> The latest nightly builds report for 4.2.x branch generated >>>>> Tue Nov 11 15:00:39 UTC 2008 - over a month ago. >>>> Weird, the others are up to date. >>>> >>>> [...investigating...] >>>> >>>> I think I've got it. Seems that the SSL certificate had expired >>>> and needed to be refreshed in order for svn to proceed with source >>>> code update. >>>> >>>> The page is up to date now (it will take a bit for the web server >>>> to pick it up). >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>>>> Farid. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Outdated-nightly-builds-results-on-apache.org-tp20976643p21282005.html Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.