Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=JN+XzjAP4tX7GFtKySHnBDl1DTZSDXkve7uUbGjRSG3+On7RpQ2ZY7riPGEOzRsPeG
         aJxFXrXLuOzJ5t8/i337DfPRUDMsSxCR4H8q6Jy1cugmWFGpelbNt29ORxzN8uKN6LSM
         FgNj56q0uQOS/4HZPUAUNyhm8nzTE8xcwuQtc=
Message-ID: <48C7F8B8.7030601@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:41:28 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r693424 -
 /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
References: <48C7D644.3080203@roguewave.com>
 <CFFDD219128FD94FB4F92B99F52D0A4901E0FC9A@exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CFFDD219128FD94FB4F92B99F52D0A4901E0FC9A@exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Travis Vitek wrote:
>  
> 
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> faridz wrote:
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> 2008-09-09  Farid Zaripov  <faridz@apache.org>
>>>
>>> 	* tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
>>> 	error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>     stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
>>>
>>> Modified: 
>> stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
>>> URL:
>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regres
>> s/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp?rev=693424&r1=693423&r2=693424&view=diff
>> ===============================================================
>> ===============
>>> --- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++ 
>> stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp Tue Sep 
>>> 9 03:35:59 2008
>>> @@ -138,14 +138,14 @@
>>>      assert (SCHAR_MAX  == +127);
>>>      assert (SHRT_MAX   >= +32767);
>>>  
>>> -#ifndef _RWSTD_EDG_ECCP
>>> +#if !defined (_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP) && !defined (_MSC_VER)
>>>
>>>
>> _RWSTD_EDG_ECCP should only be #defined when we're using the EDG eccp
>> vanilla demo, but not when we're using a compiler that sits on top of
>> the EDG front end such as Intel C++. If this condition evaluates to
>> true we have a configuration problem...
> 
> The seems valid to me. The conditional is only true for compilers other
> than EDG and Microsoft.

You're right, my mistake. I missed the '!' in front of defined.

> 
>> Martin
>>
>>>  
>>>      // avoid exercising with the EDG eccp front end (strict mode)
>>>      assert (LONG_BIT   >= 32);
>>>      assert (SSIZE_MAX  >= _POSIX_SSIZE_MAX);
>>>      assert (WORD_BIT   >= 32);
>>>  
>>> -#endif   // EDG eccp
>>> +#endif   // EDG eccp || MSVC || ICC/Windows
>>>  
>>>      assert (UCHAR_MAX  >= 255);
>>>      assert (UINT_MAX   >= 4294967295);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>