stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Farid Zaripov <>
Subject RE: svn commit: r693419 - /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/etc/config/xfail.txt
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:36:08 GMT
> Is there some reason that you didn't just fix the regression shown in
> STDCXX-1009?

  Firstly, I found the regression some time later that I commited changes in xfail.txt.

  Secondly, I want fix the regression and at the same time leave STDCXX-968 fixed :)

  Can you, please, verify that replacing 1 with 1L don't issues any warnings on 32-bit and
64-bit aCC?


View raw message