From dev-return-35578-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@sqoop.apache.org Fri Feb 2 01:48:14 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491D4180652 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 01:48:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 388E6160C56; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 829A0160C44 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 01:48:13 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 82792 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2018 00:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sqoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@sqoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@sqoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82781 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2018 00:48:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0ECDC19A916 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.511 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CYzw7AEmLMBQ for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D37FC5F2C5 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 62DCCE00C6 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 210A421301 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:48:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Attila Szabo (JIRA)" To: dev@sqoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-3052) Introduce Maven/Gradle/etc. based build for Sqoop to make it more developer friendly / open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3052?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1634= 9602#comment-16349602 ]=20 Attila Szabo commented on SQOOP-3052: ------------------------------------- Hey [~anna.szonyi], I'm a bit uncertain here: Are these patch files already for review? Could you please move the ticket = into "Patch available" state if so? Could you please also open reviewboard ticket, and link it to this Jira tic= ket? =C2=A0 Thanks, [~maugli] > Introduce Maven/Gradle/etc. based build for Sqoop to make it more develop= er friendly / open > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------ > > Key: SQOOP-3052 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3052 > Project: Sqoop > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Attila Szabo > Assignee: Anna Szonyi > Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.5.0 > > Attachments: SQOOP-3052.patch, SQOOP-3052.patch > > > The current trunk version can only be build with Ant/Ivy combination, whi= ch has some painful limitations (resolve is slow / needs to be tweaked to u= se only caches, the current profile / variable based settings are not worki= ng in IDEs out of the box, the current solution does not download the relat= ed sources, etc.) > It would be nice to provide a solution, which would give the possibility = for the developers to choose between the nowadays well used build infrsturc= tures (e.g. Maven, Gradle, etc.). For this solution it would be also essent= ial to keep the different build files (if there is more then one) synchroni= zed easily, and the configuration wouldn't diverege by time. Test execution= has to be solved also, and should cover all the available test cases. > In this scenario: > If we can provide one good working solution is much better, then provide = three different ones which become out of sync easily.=20 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)