Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-sqoop-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-sqoop-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DC918F63 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77401 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2015 06:41:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-sqoop-dev-archive@sqoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77358 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2015 06:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sqoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@sqoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@sqoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77343 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2015 06:41:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:41:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DFFA7C08D9 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:41:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2uJuGGxnn2o4 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AC6732315E for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igblz2 with SMTP id lz2so28823248igb.1 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:41:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=rfTICQ725fekwwWC1C/fyeV/5gUXwTnOnlobnGJelxQ=; b=pu71AZYdRJjWOP5ZzKYccvpPrKEdq1T+aEoON38IuBj3YMhve3rMlVVyymFGXFVt7g KIKP43YWGI/P9bIqdI1u6yPyWDROtalhTvhA15GOqiwGjAV9AOPqeRE7gDypd/LnDE4j Agcavjj1SqU1jga3W+noBOND/FqUT67DDh/ngPgtWdBNpYxkTh5pIL85WTbBNFriSedn RmKxQuXrhOCjVxcqUQLh4qv/973pqwGP2YCxsDRgQOtAt9A69xp/1DK7CzIq4PZg888d DrvStQyTMETu4wB1H1I/yJ965IRebSGVgAfAZVRMjjeFtsx2JROxqVYBcnv+HgpjTkSS kfbA== X-Received: by 10.50.143.104 with SMTP id sd8mr2219143igb.14.1433572874245; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:41:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <556ECB68.2080804@apache.org> <905435FD-25F1-443A-948E-E595028AF7D2@apache.org> <7F91673573F5D241AFCE8EDD6A313D246046D5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1A60F1A14AA475428445516E57AF7186015ADF2A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: SHANKAR REDDY Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:41:04 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANN] End of life for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x To: "dev@sqoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f1a6eddd760517d3b11d --001a1135f1a6eddd760517d3b11d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on jetty On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:19 AM Abraham Elmahrek wrote: > +1 on jetty. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Xu, Qian A wrote: > > > For short term, if the migration effort from tomcat 6.x to 7.x (or even > > 8.x) is limited, we can do a migration first. For long term I vote for > > Jetty as well. It is lightweight. Remember how complex to deploy and te= st > > with the mini Sqoop cluster? Jetty will definitively make this part of > > work easier. > > > > Thanks > > Stanley (Xu, Qian) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:45 AM > > To: dev@sqoop.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [ANN] End of life for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x > > > > +1 Jetty. > > > > > > Regards > > Richard > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gwen Shapira [mailto:gshapira@cloudera.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 12:39 AM > > To: dev@sqoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [ANN] End of life for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x > > > > Maybe even upgrade to Jetty ;) > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho > > wrote: > > > > > We=E2=80=99re still using Tomcat 6.0.x for Sqoop, so we might need to= consider > > > upgrade. > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > > > From: Mark Thomas > > > > Subject: [ANN] End of life for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x > > > > Date: June 3, 2015 at 2:39:52 AM PDT > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Cc: Tomcat Announce List , > > > announce@apache.org, Tomcat Developers List > > > > Reply-To: announce@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > The Apache Tomcat team announces that support for Apache Tomcat > > > > 6.0.x will end on 31 December 2016. > > > > > > > > This means that after 31 December 2016: > > > > - releases from the 6.0.x branch are highly unlikely > > > > - bugs affecting only the 6.0.x branch will not be addressed > > > > - security vulnerability reports will not be checked against the > > > > 6.0.x branch > > > > > > > > Three months later (i.e. after 30 March 2017) > > > > - the 6.0.x download pages will be removed > > > > - the latest 6.0.x release will be removed from the mirror system > > > > - the 6.0.x branch in svn will move from /tomcat/tc6.0.x to > > > > /tomcat/archive/tc6.0.x > > > > - the links to the 6.0.x documentation will be removed from > > > > tomcat.apache.org > > > > - The bugzilla project for 6.0.x will be made read-only > > > > > > > > Note that all 6.0.x releases will always be available from the > archive. > > > > > > > > It is anticipated that the final 6.0.x release will be made shortly > > > > before 31 December 2016. > > > > > > > > > --001a1135f1a6eddd760517d3b11d--