Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sqoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:43:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Veena Basavaraj (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12749825.1413997947000.387027.1414795414754@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12749825.1413997947000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12749825.1413997947000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12749825.1413997947786@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-1602) Sqoop2:  Fix the current balancing
 across Loaders internal to Sqoop
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14192661#comment-14192661 ] 

Veena Basavaraj commented on SQOOP-1602:
----------------------------------------

 did we we fix this?

> Sqoop2:  Fix the current balancing across Loaders internal to Sqoop 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1602
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Qian Xu
>
> The balancing of the record to the loaders in done internally in SQOOP today
> While writing the Kite Connector Qian noticed that this is not done fairly.
> While I am testing kite connector, I allocated 2 loaders. I thought data will be divided by 50% and 50% to both loaders. But actually the second loader does nothing, because its DataReader does not have any data to provide. Is it by design?
> >> About loaders do not have data in a balanced way.
> My scenario is 4 "jdbc_mysql" extractors to extract 100k row data (10MB). There are 2 Kite loaders to read data.
> This must be a bug that needs to be fixed in SQOOP ( [~abec] confirmed it.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)