From dev-return-6064-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@servicecomb.apache.org Mon Apr 29 00:37:13 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DE9BC180649 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6738 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2019 00:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@servicecomb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@servicecomb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@servicecomb.apache.org Received: (qmail 6726 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2019 00:37:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:37:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 50CFBC0CC8 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:37:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.425 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.626, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8pfM4fpJq5e for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw1-f50.google.com (mail-yw1-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C97B55FDFD for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f50.google.com with SMTP id v15so3113767ywe.13 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:37:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=24dskqhI/Xuz8A7zTZtUdkewe0am8WDUmSKlYbrzg64=; b=KX05jM+urd3DoDRbVv8FNfWIGlR88jwvaWOCDbOkjPZg+GBbp63/exdD7z4I6RVsqD g/5FFj1drgTbcGeUX1qleX4PktZsaCmwJzWIq9XvLeKLnYAjNjiYV3txNAT+scAPt/Ho ctWnvESfdAD+V38Xl5OOIiY/9IxF6yeVGEetYRqQloCQyyse9YUOB/X808G+O8/LW29f shrUNf4wf7Gubz+mPTHcNW58iXEAoMnN2QS+QW9VDmbMEVvVTLU3O6041eWTiPYx/3rr +LzHM5viGCMWUCxBvCfhyjQ7vXO5otxw19HKeH2iGuF/niAHEqhp1QOzE/tqWRhqEvfQ vQ3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=24dskqhI/Xuz8A7zTZtUdkewe0am8WDUmSKlYbrzg64=; b=DDMSTnLK2MQiwIDY+S1M2OflGaS1gO22kdoKwHdz/C8h6Sda5gmorVfFgsSrwseVOZ +WWs5sUkTJn1GsTIVR5wVBS92l1+QhS+/nCUc6zId+sKr3Ao0STpexHKUNM15hiPu0CI eUvRGZqO4KwYOCq3AJ9syCQ/JoBZmkTth8nacZve9ztbc07NvfqoVfgqhgkySxKSwre8 wFAXvWlhhvNZSUXvtPYlbFypPHOqrbYlOXGwhB7yH61oCbFWWlcWCNGdXFfaUChEYUuu v7mWGUrS4IV/iE3DHjVD1c4p8Wb7iTDpUkH+LK/SrAJGFfXiw3imGa1FSfuntkdcQG// R1Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYHvNn480uNqKREMF0ABkyT0GSv+4+xc2HOaV00TNgmgvjXuKw c/iilndfujdkjDuCp0zQOgVrY98bLNOjKs9845DFLIZd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyuz99L6Gvk8MzNp+7hAr7DnQ4X+tJuojYPsnCSQbV459gIuIk1SOCkmqseplh1IAWsPHQpNBtqS/Ag8lIhW/0= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:c1c4:: with SMTP id c187mr47832769ywd.79.1556498222889; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:37:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: wjm wjm Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:36:53 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [disscuss][java-chassis] plan to release java-chassis patch 1.2.1? To: dev@servicecomb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab42560587a07b31" --000000000000ab42560587a07b31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable create 1.2.1 branch based on current master(1.3.0-SNAPSHOT) or create a new branch based on 1.2.0 and then cherry pick? Willem Jiang =E4=BA=8E2019=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8829=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=B8=80 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=888:22=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Yeah, we could release 1.2.1 for these important patches. > As the 1.2.1 is a patch release, my suggestion is we back port the > patches of bug fixing into the 1.2.x branch, and then cut the release > candidate. > @wjm do you mind mark the JIRAs of the bug with the fix version of > 1.2.1, then we could start the cherry pick the patches into 1.2.x > branch. > > Any thought? > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: =E5=A7=9C=E5=AE=81willem > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:29 PM wjm wjm wrote: > > > > there are some important fix for 1.2.0 > > > > > > - when create microservice meta failed, will destroy failed meta, bu= t > > leak to destroy related configuration resources, rarely happen, but > it's a > > leak problem. > > - when log framework is log4j2, will leak some log4j2 marker object > for > > every request, serious leak problem > > - default to disable inject x-cse-context from edge invoker, to > > avoid security issue problem > > > > > > other changes: > > > > - support consumer and producer return Optional type > > - inspector swagger online test support work with servlet having web > > root and servlet pattern > > - inspector support view configuration items > > - fix inspector swagger to html can not scroll problem > > > > do we plan to release a patch 1.2.1? > --000000000000ab42560587a07b31--