From dev-return-5412-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@servicecomb.apache.org Tue Oct 23 08:54:55 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DAB0C18066B for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4499 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2018 06:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@servicecomb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@servicecomb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@servicecomb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4486 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2018 06:54:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:54:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AE67ACE8FE for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:54:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.103 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnAw4g_NQIMY for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com (mail-wr1-f48.google.com [209.85.221.48]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9B5A55F524 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id q7-v6so331061wrr.8 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nwstc+/fLZqvcelvxs6h5FEJd3PfwhPxz7ZX3uZ1P3s=; b=esqyLJBofGUtFGKVgTAJSLtfzmCmrJfTLxq3RIUKauDhaBLtR1qT0jzU2kJzNXES5Z zm0yPKXjh+xUgClyN0sKE49ODLbDL8bN0p6YmyzH6OZ5vyK2rNaODJppwuR05Diajo8d hsJl2qf9r9tFHlmjmQXM0Hr1yzVqNTcmHV1QqXP9nsIC0D3JpBqkSGfrL272B37xggDW h+t3lTa+SMbl4FkdDjsLmRIEYqUZ8CdsLPQm6syi1ZMw2hl0Kd6Lp418TGoii9Y9i6L6 CXFcRvOMW6KW52MnKepWpeV/AIuXy7vzwH26JGkUHa9qW1bKW9k6FJ1A89WYZTn5KoEn RCPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nwstc+/fLZqvcelvxs6h5FEJd3PfwhPxz7ZX3uZ1P3s=; b=WgxQVi1Ml2fOT/593tvtGBIUvU3iMI9thgosrBxiFGjjDwYbI/MY7Bz8LxVRLDgxk1 v+0ZoPzdL8U1BtCoTIpz9My4GNcxp43isDRa5mmTUWFAPlWXN5PwP43dA4yzxUV8Q3dy B7wVvlduB/rwOjqYQMZ4YHYaKPdwOyukcP6Nr50lOZKcefJ9tKvC7oUXu0VP+oQbn0kd AE9koWdFVVlH3kFKlc/xFixFFOFfAZMbFgQQ6duoBrCRAtpVWDvzwia6p1HQdfdWoOlr SSTNpOVkY5EfKet3tXHTZOONo4u1BK/ODjOPZbGjeYUuGjtMxDovt7XekzeK02HBc0Vz jFtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKLujtrHq/DFKdr/U9KXjeJqkhUGauW8yi8XwC5mpDcict2n8KW PRu8CYUFBFrX4FYfD/ttAQGjRYFpL2j8bygNOPVOY7bT X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cLSQIAWqPsT1W2vEQX6OY36YCVCxj0aCBCLMDVgDBPo+IyP1esTnBDxer4dBcY86qxzs/G88/O+7+R2JGZ27k= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f712:: with SMTP id r18-v6mr4660284wrp.85.1540277690924; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:54:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Willem Jiang Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:54:38 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is saga named right? To: dev@servicecomb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Team=EF=BC=8C As TCC is quite different with the Saga implementation. I'm planning to move the Pack code and TCC related code out of Saga repo. In this way we can just keep Saga repo to have the implementation for Saga. Any thought=EF=BC=9F Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: =E5=A7=9C=E5=AE=81willem On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:27 PM Willem Jiang wrote= : > > Yeah, once we plan to support the TCC in the Saga project , we need to co= nsider to rename the project name. > Current we have two different implementation of Saga, one is centric Sag= a, the other is based the Pack (Omega/Alpha). > Now we implement the TCC protocol on top of Pack architecture. > > Maybe we can rearrange the package name base on this Architecture and mov= e the Pack code to another repo. > Any thought? > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: =E5=A7=9C=E5=AE=81willem > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:09 PM fu chengeng wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> as we all knows that,saga is a kind of transaction agreement,And we = named this project as saga because we support only this kind of agreement. >> But now,we are going to support tcc, and maybe many other transactio= n agreement like xa will be supported. >> Whether we should change saga to other name to prevent confused when= it is in incubating? >> >>