servicecomb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yang Bo <oaky...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Clean up the old saga modules
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:32:33 GMT
Seems everyone is OK with deleting the legacy code.
I'll include those changes as part of the m1 release.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think it depends on the user requirement.
> we can keep the old code there, if the user want to use it , we can put it
> back.
>
> On 2/26/18, Zheng Feng <zh.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It looks good. Do we want to support the old saga module in the future ?
> >
> > 2018-02-24 16:47 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi team,
> >>
> >> As we are planning the servicecomb-saga binary release[1], I found out
> >> there are some old saga modules in the current master branch need to be
> >> archived.
> >>
> >> My proposal is we create a branch which holds current master branch
> codes
> >> and remove the old saga module from the master branch. After that, we
> >> just
> >> put the pack modules into the binary release of servicecomb-saga.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-346
> >>
> >> Willem Jiang
> >>
> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
> >>           http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
> >> Twitter: willemjiang
> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>           http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Yang.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message