river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: converting RegistrarImpl to public class
Date Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:32:58 GMT
>
>
>  A factory makes it nice and easy to get what one is after whilst providing
>> a
>> layer of separation that affords a lot of flex in building exactly what's
>> required.
>>
>
> Shall we go for a 'protected' for both registrar implementations then?
> Because if you want to work with the binary dist, and stay out of the
> package space for river, work without reflection, you need to have some
> access.
>
>
Okay, works for me.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message