Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D67F994F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89597 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 13:09:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 89563 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 13:09:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 89555 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2011 13:09:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:09:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fraser.adams@blueyonder.co.uk designates 81.103.221.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [81.103.221.48] (HELO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:08:58 +0000 Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.4]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20111007130836.HIVG21463.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:08:36 +0100 Received: from [82.33.36.91] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RCAAG-0002MG-QR for users@qpid.apache.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:08:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4E8EF9DD.7040100@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:08:45 +0100 From: Fraser Adams User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: How to set a binding on a receiver References: <4E8C1629.4060206@list-group.com> <4E8C3164.8010308@redhat.com> <4E8ECADF.3040205@blueyonder.co.uk> <4E8EF3DA.4020600@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E8EF3DA.4020600@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=0ZzmyYADvgoA:10 a=SZ2Un3Q-vIwA:10 a=3NElcqgl2aoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=HvDeMNRvPjpUA68VPjQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=wF68PkdDzXlJemXb:21 a=x6GxtQfmroYrf5sJ:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 > I guess it depends on how you interpret 'directly'. What I meant was > that the API does not support modifying the bindings or other address > properties for a receiver once it is created. > I expect that my interpretation of the term "API" is "looser" than yours :-) I guess that I (in my head at any rate) look on the address options as part of the messaging API 'cause that's the only way to set many things that were once explicit method calls in the client API. Frase --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscribe@qpid.apache.org