Mailing-List: contact dev-help@polygene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@polygene.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hedhman@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CADmm+KfzBJxTBNpWK4vTNMMG_TOSdJYXqh=ugMj6dXNAN0nmdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADmm+KcqU5iu7JF-cJ6U3LCuasQWpm8_TteF0inOnDi8uycr4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADmm+Kf9V-VvF1WBLxGuG1T6U4JUD7vVu4TLpFtcwWYJ1iM=5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <0c3bfb446c2849f984cffe820ff7a488@nosphere.org> <CADmm+KfTeoGdPVin4q2WssG8Ap=iyW+-0oxa7HjgcnOH6aLtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADmm+Kcm0bWhzg++gqMa99oG+PY0que-3MnOLFnFo7LhGyj6qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADmm+Keb=QdQgZMGqx4Oh405dhftuW6Dw-vm-WNFdMo44FxwRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <6640a90a9c79c0ad651abdc8a43b9dd6@nosphere.org> <CADmm+KfzBJxTBNpWK4vTNMMG_TOSdJYXqh=ugMj6dXNAN0nmdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 07:15:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CADmm+Ke3gXvnt_uZ6FZpBEbZsz+oKkT72iMQcFC4_Mz+vMoGCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Don't throw Exceptions during Bootstrap
To: dev@polygene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1cc6aa4056bd054c3738fa
archived-at: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:15:39 -0000

--94eb2c1cc6aa4056bd054c3738fa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Now, I just need to figure out why some tests are failing because of my
deferral of reporting. Probably wrong kind of exceptions thrown in many
cases.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:

> Right, but I am still not sure clarity increases, since generic types
> variants can't override each other there is no ambiguity. I think I want =
to
> keep the types without package names and without generic type information=
.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Paul Merlin <paulmerlin@apache.org> wrote=
:
>
>> Le 2017-03-31 05:02, Niclas Hedhman a =C3=A9crit :
>>
>>> The full format would have been;
>>>
>>> Composition Problems Report:
>>>     message: No implementation found for method
>>>     method: java.util.Map<java.lang.String, java.lang.Integer>
>>> doAnotherThing(String name, int value)
>>>     types: [Person,ValueComposite]
>>>
>>> (i.e. toString on a ParameterizedType) which I find quite annoying.
>>> Seldom
>>> enough the package name should be needed.
>>>
>>
>> Ok. I was thinking about our Classes.simpleGenericNameOf(Type type)
>> utility method that should make it easy to get:
>>
>> Composition Problems Report:
>>     message: No implementation found for method
>>     method: Map<String, Integer> doAnotherThing(String name, int value)
>>     types: [Person,ValueComposite]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>


--=20
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java

--94eb2c1cc6aa4056bd054c3738fa--