Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE751200D06 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CD4091609E9; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C6081609B5 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 20693 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2017 21:11:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@orc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@orc.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@orc.apache.org Received: (qmail 20644 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2017 21:11:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4751BC0D94 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.38 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.38 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yATO1dZNfy0t for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BB26A61032 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id r20so8990761oie.0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0EebwgfCVMt65kRekog2xJhkieY7FoF4vj+NT/UBGj8=; b=gAkqBTywJ8sbp3ki4ITrg3Ksng9I9GaAB0iNIcwACyX5XrZKaixYzS5i2oEUVJ65Nw 4nBPbCcRDcoll+eH0j6Dek+1UANeiLYMqUWAtvTBmopOyBly/vC+9q/SME3uvtwY6rJI 3P+FMr29SY42qFcpGX91chkBvnMEzSP+SHSE5T8Rm4vStNmdlW7eb052vGbAQKClQUXn mwh4zgraK1y9eMSczfM7tjmK5KjdJ2TduKgxXgES1u0MOhwhOQPaZfTc2QvnMZCq3SuA PeqLowGyJDctT7Hqx1wo5j7u3NvDbFHgXnGjxXZXjAYZIQooWB0/l26AyvBPIFl2JNmE YH/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0EebwgfCVMt65kRekog2xJhkieY7FoF4vj+NT/UBGj8=; b=tPmLAmHQg24unq0kli27FuWns6+i098SU+kCZzVlpHZIR7A8g0PV286Fc/blgt3tv+ ht4METkd6O+MM7czm9mSwxcSJoOMsbYKZ+1m5mgSgujV4Iq2aYAj1oAr7o2ZPWLRzcYE R/uvArXfcil1w0a8yKaY0BU6tDKYoiC+7wJig/8aRBVlh64lwP52ukNg3HrUfzanzY8n +iRxLkF6t9KvnrD5fJ2hqxIZ3q+8ZkO1+yczuDKqiT1mHMJoG2dOdEvY/9EzO88shFRk slnQThMD0Uid7cYBZ5pzXfm+6dfyBYfT/feUyTjKNtaXWHxJjlhcPrcYyJ3tDfuA5HFQ SLpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhVHauxAJB6EOxKA7MdJehU9DoXKzB6PkUPSMZ4l05sOhyCW3J3 vo1KyUJuE7NS0PBRFXHAhBxTY9LenTT6HZ6xfNapww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBOfY8fxKgg8GpLuU2yQDcjwec4mG9bYo228nk1UNb1VGk5Cq0uuUeX9Sq+mIVsxoXNbEYppgLfIGqSg0wS+lc= X-Received: by 10.157.46.203 with SMTP id w69mr979273ota.36.1506373904230; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.17.169 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Owen O'Malley" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:11:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Google Protobuf Version To: user@orc.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ee1e475f342055a0a01da" archived-at: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:11:53 -0000 --001a113ee1e475f342055a0a01da Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Yonatan Augarten wrote: > Would you say that it's likely that this error (*Protocol message > contained an invalid tag (zero)*) is caused by the wrong version? > No, it is likely something else. However, I haven't seen that error coming out of the ORC reader before. Can you give me the whole stack trace? Are you sure that it is a valid ORC file? Thanks, Owen --001a113ee1e475f342055a0a01da Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Yonatan Augarten <yoni@intango.com> wrote:
Would y= ou say that it's likely that this error (Protocol message contained an invalid ta= g (zero)) is caused by the wrong version?

=C2=A0No, it is likely something else. However, I hav= en't seen that error coming out of the ORC reader before. Can you give = me the whole stack trace? Are you sure that it is a valid ORC file?

Thanks,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Owen
--001a113ee1e475f342055a0a01da--