Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-orc-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-orc-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00D5118F73 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41511 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2015 16:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-orc-user-archive@orc.apache.org Received: (qmail 41480 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2015 16:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@orc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@orc.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@orc.apache.org Received: (qmail 41470 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2015 16:21:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:21:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 793301A76D4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:21:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=darose.net Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jjqpg1Wg8TMH for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8E93124972 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA9E392082 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=darose.net; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=darose.net; bh=RC5nSO TuAkWAWWSIB3yvJYW0hT4=; b=1WmU5i9GgvFpgio0S91gjCZa6wm4UaBZlW064i 7669mWIzOYx5hHdQZc+ruD4RYXcnWZqBsVxKmd9jXb6ivCNzz2T4PVbWmI3nMHxW /8O0Pvh0ftWefro2tFrucxwVWn1nzRFFJnF0DnnukLZXdUMtsDKeMJ1OzMFiXE+G xhb20= Received: from darsys12 (cpe-67-250-36-173.nyc.res.rr.com [67.250.36.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darose@darose.net) by homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDB0F392061 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.0.2] by darsys12 with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIJEn-0007Qu-Bz for user@orc.apache.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:20:49 -0400 Subject: Re: OrcInputFormat vs. OrcNewInputFormat To: user@orc.apache.org References: <55B10FD7.2000908@darose.net> From: David Rosenstrauch Message-ID: <55B11461.70808@darose.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:20:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ah, that makes sense now. Thanks! DR On 07/23/2015 12:18 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We need better names. :) > > The big difference is that OrcInputFormat implements > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.InputFormat and OrcNewInputFormat extends > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.InputFormat. So pick based on whether you want > to use the mapred or mapreduce apis. > > .. Owen > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:01 AM, David Rosenstrauch > wrote: > >> Just wondering what's the difference between these 2 classes. Is there a >> guideline as to when we should use one vs. the other? >> >> Thanks, >> >> DR >> >