From dev-return-63995-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openoffice.apache.org Sat Oct 20 13:04:33 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AA480180668 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 94705 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2018 11:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 94681 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2018 11:04:30 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:04:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7D574C01C2 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:04:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ww_a3CUN5Zai for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.215]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4EE8F5F490 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1343BA1156 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:04:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:subject:subject :references:in-reply-to:message-id:reply-to:from:from:date:date :received; s=mail20150812; t=1540033459; bh=k3UDRiGBQVR7QM7942cT aXu/zCFG9nfjr69kx9/du5Q=; b=qBh+P+HH5gVcZ4s3GUcbawJXIDF8jDY/bbZS Js7USs1OLEO7rAQgpCvBJun5EFDzE+M3w41zlw6gz3hkXp4y/DedC6MpJSg1LIug DTT81LYyyyrVlcjmS3xXly9HFc/C9q3p325859SVjnuoal6SBtipJCEBFGrIj2IZ zgFA4jbdUMDzlXgo2q3vCUC/Tcv15SbRyM90ky5xf14vadxnjEsM23nTPyKVmMzn Qw4y/1UDlaaC6S+WqUuJasKSHAny87bwPCZs7nDHfyzDJmZq9wBB+48Dwoy81klD M1VcP3YY/6WxVGltBbL4JE/SWSgtk/qMWd9WfdzkTkN96ed3GA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id dQufGyqgJJqk for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:04:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 12:04:18 +0100 (WEST) From: Pedro Lino Reply-To: Pedro Lino To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Message-ID: <1088665920.46185.1540033458979@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: References: <7bab1cc8-6683-c211-5be9-8ab6e42f6f0e@hamburg.de> <78CA67E9-6972-4227-B8EF-78ADBED146B9@jaguNET.com> <762792328.46118.1540030910730@office.mailbox.org> Subject: Re: Test builds of AOO 4.1.6 HEAD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_46184_1128507789.1540033458965" X-Priority: 3 Importance: Medium ------=_Part_46184_1128507789.1540033458965 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Matthias > On October 20, 2018 at 11:26 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > > > > I can confirm that it is running as expected under Ubuntu 16.04 x64 (Thanks Jim!) > > > > > > > > The About box does have a quite different text compared from what is produced by the buildbots. > > > > > > > > https://i.imgur.com/3r5Btju.png > > > > > Yes, of course! > > We modified the text because many people used these builds for > "productive" work. ;-) > > But the question remains why the copyright year is different? > I am aware of the Buildbot differences... What I was referring to is that it is not only the copyright year. It is also missing the sentence "Portion copyright The Apache Software Foundation" It seems that the text in the About dialog is customized on each builder's system and therefore it is not standardized? Regards, Pedro ------=_Part_46184_1128507789.1540033458965--