openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: gstreamer status for 4.2.0-dev?
Date Mon, 28 May 2018 07:12:48 GMT
3. Build on a newer CentOS or other distro.
4. Link to 1.0.0 using run-time dynamic linking, using that patch I made,
and only require the gstreamer-1.0.0 tarball at compile time to find the
headers.

Damjan

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 9:06 AM Peter kovacs <petko@apache.org> wrote:

> Imho the gstreamer libs are still the method of choice for doing
> multimedia.
>
> The current state is that trunk can utilize the gstreamer API 1.0.0
>
> We have the issue not resolved the issue to provide gstreamer for
> different Distributions. (Main issue: centos6 is to old to support the new
> gstreamer 1.0.0 API)
> We have 2 suggestions to solve the issue:
> 1) implement 0.1.0 and 1.0.0 API.
> 2) move the implementation into an optional extention.
>
> Both solutions have currently not followed up.
>
> All the best
> Peter
>
> Am 26. Mai 2018 18:53:46 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>:
> >On 05/23/2018 05:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> Subj line sez it all... where are we? There was a proposal to make it
> >a run-time dependency but afaict there hasn't been any effort yet it
> >doing that.
> >>
> >> I know we have a handful of other things TODO re: 4.2.0 but this
> >seems to be an inflection point for the Linux builds and so I really
> >think we need to resolve this if we have any intent in getting a 4.2.0
> >beta out in a reasonable time frame.
> >
> >What would happen if we simply stopped including the --with-gstreamer
> >option in the build? Mac and Windows builds don't use it, and it only
> >applies to Linux.
> >
> >I haven't investigated the code much to see how the gstreamer libraries
> >are used. The Linux distros now mostly use Freedesktop lower level
> >interfaces except I don't know what Unity uses. Is building with
> >gstreamer still needed/compliant with this? In short, how are video
> >applications determined in Linux now? Do we need a different approach
> >for integration of video objects in Linux?
> >
> >If anyone knows the history of this, it would be very helpful to this
> >discussion.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message