Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0483F200D69 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:21:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0168D160C23; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4600B160C20 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:21:33 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 50250 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2017 16:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 50238 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2017 16:21:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8AB4118071E for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V56RpkoL-vx8 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9AEBD5F396 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i143so15683469ioa.3 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:21:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0j17qv4mqdaqU0rUo45XTMj4UCR1T9SAFhX6nK8hOdY=; b=NDhsuecmrsIs90lISf4sCgmse0TeSBM/lav1i6NK1M2HuASwKDsZBK9GIdknJqDQcn UIf/ARCLy/jmC4F9/6BmAkzrckI9Y6+7NQTWM5sMNCaX0Z+tEFTJNGLTjl7HGrc6+0f+ 4iR6btx7D9tIINYGtHwCDlt/rO86yac1ny/gL7rZ7QfP9PWP2r5k/H35hopeypqRMCbS cl8yzMHhMhDCnP6yBohCMXrbHSu8tPD3vzzaDMchtAKoF5T/5zCWE1jNlowdZYOHe+oy PAOou+3ZI8ACjPhe1QanRT8iwWt4e9PppnwAAEHKvguw8ksIIJFiDByelrsJpErGBQD2 xMyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0j17qv4mqdaqU0rUo45XTMj4UCR1T9SAFhX6nK8hOdY=; b=anYvi4qeEehKPPOoX6cHyWAe4U1Ylv0KcYy5B6xlC8frmN1UZ6Em1ib0kS4Ov3yu3r 3VxFbNmL1G16IxCUv0fHzrcIWzxBSlAUFsNlGOqppgFhwUsLsMaHviiCm7dYk6KQES9d 5mzi9el6hwCISzOCeHvrQhNLPeRtp5dbugUz9I4ipXfmL4Woa/W4tzbMmFcuI8LGY4aC Evgb+xv6eLpg5BA4eGzSA4Nw8Sl7zDlZNpuYANSXey4Dg7gMsIj89W9RbHYI9O2tLK19 2Na6rnhMG8yBikkwROU1bcHeZVwV1BQnamwzdJC8uyQXvaVpd1AjfTWuic0dy2GMa9d/ ww5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mI8PYxcksgO+3a1HukET6/C5h1nuUMOldYPz5REIcY25LEdtrJD py34Mw5htgKRQzaOiqafdUuDxGBiFASCMgEiT3A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovkfwhqCK4uSsdjNCY6iOb4Wt0vprmXEXmZOuf921xVMiA+URGb7f/JmIGy8TMONNYFaQ1PMubokeUOchzmfVk= X-Received: by 10.107.10.219 with SMTP id 88mr37836017iok.285.1514391688785; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.29.15 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.29.15 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171224172304.72ff3dd907e3420c8a766406@iol.ie> References: <20171224172304.72ff3dd907e3420c8a766406@iol.ie> From: Kay Schenk Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:21:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with large fles in Writer? To: OOo Apache Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f7b6ea9342a056154ca40" archived-at: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:21:34 -0000 --001a113f7b6ea9342a056154ca40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Rory-- Can any of the files you're working with be deposited in some publicly accessible location for others to test? Especially the older OO test files? -------- MzK On Dec 24, 2017 09:23, "Rory O'Farrell" wrote: > I have some large files made with OO 2.x and 3.x; one I currently have in > front of me is the complete works of Jane Austen, which I built out of the > individual files some time ago - as this is all public domain, I can share > it. This file on OO4 is about 1.7 MB, 800k words, 4 million chars, 3200 A5 > pages. > > It flies in LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on an Xubuntu 16.04.03 system (2 x 4788 > Bogomips), 4 GB ram, SATA hard disk. On my main machine. using OO 4.1.5 > RC1), but also on earlier OO 4.1.x versions, on Xubuntu 16.04.03 (4 x 6185 > Bogomips) 8 GB ram, SSD disk drive [a machine with 4 cores, each core about > 130% faster than the lesser powered machine] it is glacial. > > I asked OO to add an extra heading level into the ToC - memory twitching > about 570 MB, one core completely engaged, no response after 60 minutes > I'll leave it run to see if it completes. The LibreOffice machine is using > 525 MB ram, and no core when not updating the ToC. It did the Index rebuild > in about 12 seconds. Page count is dramatically different - LO ~2400 A5 > pages, OO ~3200 A5 pages) (fonts are identical on both machines). I'm not > at present worrying about that - I'll try a small file (300 pages) and see > how that matches across suites. > > I have also noted that some very large sample files (made to examine page > number limitations some years ago) won't open on current OO versions - the > files that will open are the smaller ones (~55K pages not ~120K pages). > > I'm thinking (purely because I can't be stopped) that OO is each time > reverting to the start of the file when doing layout (as Alt Search and > Replace does), whereas LO does layout in one stream from the beginning. The > hard disks don't come into the problem, as Swap files have not been touched. > > > -- > Rory O'Farrell > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --001a113f7b6ea9342a056154ca40--