Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4540E200D58 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:48:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 43ADE160C19; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 23:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 877F1160BFB for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:48:49 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 53422 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2017 23:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 53407 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2017 23:48:48 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 23:48:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.27] (unknown [151.67.52.62]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8AAB21A0044; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5A233BDC.5010104@apache.org> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 00:48:44 +0100 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type References: <964767102.58927531.1512119214263.JavaMail.root@zimbra60-e10.priv.proxad.net> <2EF9C890-E57B-4326-8A67-7FA49C668D3B@apache.org> <8029fb29-7bb5-8822-4fa1-faebb0481677@Apache.org> <1512210163.993.66.camel@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1512210163.993.66.camel@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 23:48:50 -0000 Peter Kovacs wrote: > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20819 ... > The best way imho is to let the users vote. How about follwing flow: > 1) check if we can include the extention by license or find an > agreement with the maintainers. > 2) Put a call to Vote if the package should be included or not on the > Forums, as sticky. > 3) advertise the vote and have a discussion with the community. > (Announcement, Youtube, Googleplus, facebook, user mailing list > 4) After a month we gather the results and follow the desicion. Well, if you get past item 1 then you are done! Seriously, if new code is contributed and available I don't see reasons to keep it out (note: I see this as a reasonable feature for Calc). Actually, there is an "item zero" which is preliminary to all this discussion, and it is: 0) Does the extension work with the latest OpenOffice release? Does it actually do what one would expect from the issue or not? If the answer to item 0 is "no", then the entire discussion is pointless. I haven't tested and I don't have time now, but the latest release of that extension is quite old, so I wouldn't take for granted that it works. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org