openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus <>
Subject Re: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:40:13 GMT
Am 02.12.2017 um 11:22 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Am Freitag, den 01.12.2017, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 01.12.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> For me the existance is not a strong argument. The bug is with 149
>>> votes
>>> quite popular. The discussion there is a repeatance that this is
>>> basic
>>> feature.
>> but we don't know from when the votes are. Or is there a possiblity
>> to
>> see in Bugzilla? The issue report is old as we can see on the ID.
>> The
>> extension could have been created after all or the most votes were
>> done.
> Since you can not renew your vote have to assume the vote goes to
> provide a feature. It is difficult to dstinguish. However it is a
> strongly requested feature that we can read from it.
> The best way imho is to let the users vote. How about follwing flow:
> 1) check if we can include the extention by license or find an
> agreement with the maintainers.
> 2) Put a call to Vote if the package should be included or not on the
> Forums, as sticky.
> 3) advertise the vote and have a discussion with the community.
> (Announcement, Youtube, Googleplus, facebook, user mailing list
> 4) After a month we gather the results and follow the desicion.
> To be clear, I am not favoured for or against inclusion of an
> extention. But for me it is crucial that people can see a concept
> behind our decisions.
> We said we would like to give our users a voice. Wouldn't it be
> appropriate to give them exactly this voice? This is a clear concept to
> me.


Sorry when this sounds too negative but thats my opinion. I think at the 
moment we should spend our time for more important features and 
processes than this special thing.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message