openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:09:53 GMT
Am Samstag, den 02.12.2017, 09:19 -0500 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Playing devils advocate, does it make sense to introduce
> Yet Another Build System at this stage?
I see it as for the search for the future build system. There is always
the discussion popping up what to use.
Gbuild seem to make some troubles. We have looked into Maven with no
good result.
So far satisfactory outcome. So you as the release team still use the
old one with the known difficulties.

I think we should give it a try. Well buts that me, as a noob I want to
try always all options and then decide where my favours are.
> 
> Also, there are a few projects that I know of that
> use SCons. In general, one of the most popular common
> threads related to them are "Why the hell are you using SCons?" :)

Do they bash or is there some serious arguments behind that?- I am
always interested in negative opinion as long as they have substance.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message