Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD049200CCE for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 11:31:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AB7181644EA; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F0AC91644D6 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 11:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51620 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2017 09:31:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 51605 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2017 09:31:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 528711A0087 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwjxb-3XdvCv for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ngcobalt39.manitu.net (ngcobalt39.manitu.net [217.11.48.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CBB4B5FACE for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Esprimo7935 (tmo-096-226.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.96.226]) (Authenticated sender: xjs01) by ngcobalt39.manitu.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33D0C262650F for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 11:31:40 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Schmidt?= To: References: <719d0a75-d889-ffbd-c528-090353f6bf3a@hamburg.de> In-Reply-To: <719d0a75-d889-ffbd-c528-090353f6bf3a@hamburg.de> Subject: Re: [Website] Format of links Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 11:31:48 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: AdMDjuoAl4z1/EC3Sh28p7t0e2NYkgABrQfQ archived-at: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:31:45 -0000 From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de]=20 > For my Korean translator it is important... ;-) > In general, all languages with characters that have=20 > descenders are barely readable: > g j =C3=A7 =C4=85 =C4=99 =C4=BC -> g j =C3=A7 =C4=85 =C4=99 =C4=BC OK, now I understand that the question specifically related to the = Korean website. I had previously believed them to be generally meant. But a general word: I believe that every one of us, who works on the website, can decide = such details himself - without which he later gets criticism. formally: please use "Lazy Consensus": https://openoffice.apache.org/docs/governance/lazyConsensus.html imho: In cases like this, Lazy Consensus is more efficient than a = discussion.=09 greetings, J=C3=B6rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org