Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Message-ID: <57018055.3080305@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:43:01 -0400
From: Carl Marcum <cmarcum@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: procedure for going from RC to release
References: <57011BFF.7000109@apache.org> <570132E7.80009@wtnet.de>
 <57013B7B.7020404@apache.org> <57016086.20805@apache.org>
 <5701720B.8060405@apache.org> <570178D1.8080903@apache.org>
 <57017C43.3090403@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <57017C43.3090403@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 04/03/2016 04:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Carl Marcum wrote:
>> I hope you don't take my suggestion for disagreement.
>
> Of course not. Let's simply find together the right way to publish 
> this source package in the tree. As I wrote, I am OK with adding 
> devtools/ provided this doesn't break the JS generation for download 
> page. I see no other significant drawbacks.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>

Hopefully someone can determine if this will or not.

I have a few different tools I would like to release and don't want to 
dilute the main release folder if it's not necessary.

If there is a problem with this devtools sub-folder or I don't have 
confirmation that it will not be,  I will do as you suggested.

Thanks for your help,
Carl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org