Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DA8419235 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77497 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2016 09:31:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 77410 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2016 09:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 77399 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2016 09:31:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 722BEC1375 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:31:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.717 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.717 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLJeW0xlBkQs for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-smtp-ng-out-1b.wtnet.de (mail-smtp-ng-out-1.wtnet.de [84.46.103.117]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 711C95F47C for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bc2-blade2.wtnet.de (mail-cust-ng-in-4.wtnet.de [84.46.103.104] (may be forged)) by bc1-blade6.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2Q9Ux63004554 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:30:59 +0100 X-WT-Originating-IP: 46.59.230.150 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (CM-POP8-660.catv.wtnet.de [46.59.230.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc2-blade2.wtnet.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u2Q9UxWi030164 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:30:59 +0100 Message-ID: <56F656D3.7040704@wtnet.de> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:30:59 +0100 From: Marcus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field References: <56EF0325.90203@gmail.com> <56EF1159.3090500@apache.org> <005b01d182fa$4d280bc0$e7782340$@acm.org> <56F01CE1.2000505@acm.org> <00ab01d183a4$a9440ee0$fbcc2ca0$@acm.org> <56F06941.8090406@gmail.com> <56F07692.3030205@wtnet.de> <56F085D6.8060001@wtnet.de> <00a101d183e3$c040c4a0$40c24de0$@acm.org> <56F10999.7060308@wtnet.de> <56F10A2C.7050200@wtnet.de> <56F11FBE.2050500@apache.org> <005e01d18452$38b66fc0$aa234f40$@acm.org> <56F174D5.8040802@wtnet.de> <56F59877.6080805@apache.org> <56F5BF15.6030708@wtnet.de> <56F5C617.7090801@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <56F5C617.7090801@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 25/03/2016 Marcus wrote: > >> Within this thread the agreemnt seems to be to use RESOLVED - MANAGED or >> RESOLVED - DONE. In the meantime I tent to RESOLVED - DONE. > > If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the > result of bringing more confusion! So: I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one status for "resolved with a code fix" and the other for "resolved somehow else". > - FIXED, MANAGED, DONE are very close in meaning, at least for me. If > you want to single out the "nothing to do with code" situation, I > recommend that we go for something more explicit, like NOCODE or > similar. So RESOLVED-NOCODE would simply mean "resolved without any code > being committed". It doesn't have to be "NOCODE", but it should be > something that means "nothing to do with code", and DONE does not really > convey the right meaning here. Then NOCODEFIX sounds more concrete. Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org