Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Message-ID: <56EE89EC.1030604@wtnet.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:30:52 +0100
From: Marcus <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de;
 rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans
References: <56EB3B95.50807@apache.org> <56EE67AB.4080409@wtnet.de>
 <56EE7B71.7080000@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <56EE7B71.7080000@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 03/20/2016 11:29 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 20/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
>> Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability
>>> at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project
>>> releases requiring a vote? ...
>> @all:
>> Is there anything that would speak against that Carl is going on with
>> this procedure from the past?
>
> I suggest that we continue as in the past. The NetBeans plugin is not
> related, code-wise, to the OpenOffice "main" releases at all, and we can
> just let Carl maintain it with lazy consensus as usual, with no need for
> a formal release.

that's good. It's also my impression that we don't need any more formal way.

@Rory:
Sorry, it seems I should have point out my opinion more visible. ;-)

Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org