Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B259E18DC3 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58649 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 17:39:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 58585 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 17:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 58499 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2016 17:39:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:39:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 663CB1806AD for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.971 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.971 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-oc6lTwXv12 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bird.oak.relay.mailchannels.net (bird.oak.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.215.17]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D82875F56F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A176ACEDC for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a2s42.a2hosting.com (ip-10-37-2-55.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.37.2.55]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EBFE74099 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:39:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com Received: from a2s42.a2hosting.com (a2s42.a2hosting.com [10.122.71.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.6.7); Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:39:39 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: a2hosting X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1457113179143:331270166 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1457113179143 Received: from 75-165-114-5.tukw.qwest.net ([75.165.114.5]:33224 helo=Astraendo2) by a2s42.a2hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1abthR-003E7d-FO for dev@openoffice.apache.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:39:37 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <003c01d17323$b021a6a0$1064f3e0$@acm.org> <56D72FF5.9090307@acm.org> <00ab01d174bb$a5d0dc90$f17295b0$@acm.org> <005c01d17580$ecab0670$c6011350$@acm.org> <56D8BCC3.4070008@acm.org> <00d801d175b1$4fff2f00$effd8d00$@acm.org> <56D8E840.8050205@acm.org> <56D95C86.5010602@acm.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Profile.c bugs (was RE: Some thoughts on the learning curve) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:39:41 -0800 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <004b01d1763c$d649a140$82dce3c0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQEYt3sDAegnni14uEJXPSBAluhsHgFsRKnjAf3TzfQBRz+IPQJuHYp2AmvVPVsB4U/a0gCjG9fEAn6mK+gCyjTBCKAwNcGA Content-Language: en-us X-AuthUser: himself@orcmid.com Damjan, A question below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:damjan@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 04:41 > To: Apache OO > Subject: Re: Profile.c bugs (was RE: Some thoughts on the learning > curve) >=20 > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Patricia Shanahan = wrote: [ ... ] > main/sal/rtl/source/bootstrap.cxx uses osl::Profile().readString() in > 1 place. osl::Profile found in main/sal/inc/osl/profile.hxx is a thin > C++ wrapper around the C API. That seems to be the extent of the usage > of the profile API in SVN trunk. I can't remember where else I found > them, but on > = https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/WritingUNO/Manua > l_Component_Installation > there is a brief mention of these ini/rc files that I suspect are > parsed by the profile API. Examples are in the program/ directory of > the AOO installation (there is quite a few, all ending in ".ini" on > Windows and "rc" elsewhere, eg. uno.ini/unorc). [ ... ] [orcmid]=20 On modern installations of Windows, the Program Files (x86) folder is = read/read-execute only and requires UAC approval to be written to, in = general. Looking at my machine, I see that only setup.ini and soffice.ini were = created at the time of 4.1.2 installation (2015-11-10 for the one I am = looking at) and the remainder, including bootstrap.ini, were copied = directly from the setup itself and have earlier time stamps (mostly = 2015-10-21 when the RC was built). That answers the question about whether these are actually = produced/used. Indeed they are. Thanks, Damjan, this clears up a great deal. =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org