Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF99017211 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52194 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2015 13:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 52111 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2015 13:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 52099 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2015 13:48:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:48:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A719D1A08D6 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:48:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.879 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xzKeIkVmu8F for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D776020382 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so101411968wic.0 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IgcITdT/IqR9xpbT/RARhwBenmw9X0gwZcOvxPYQGZs=; b=f6WNlnn8+O0rVF+y8j52lvdQneI029sX5u3tLUzmUF7WIzf09GC8QjlUZFBVMekEVl MTc0nLumt011d6SDzqW8sKFR2SBZX4wM5qynmujEuEGiIiEZV0IybbEe3wnHmwTm0Y+z O/6/ShOruF6hD1VUN2iQ8F0Rz3mok2wbo5W52KWbi5m6HuTpw3vJk6+WmvxJur4W4Bx2 V9F2Foi1G/7MeR5VLRR5HS+v+qFI8ycJCj8fS51mxLd5IyWIQK5kLSylDq1ip/8KjVD4 pIEm1e8G+BssW/wBoSUIcRDZH5eKyfGTpgJZviXK9LXGIQYSbzYCR0MOMny23lWMwzc9 2xrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.112.104 with SMTP id ip8mr23771099wjb.85.1444484888413; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.173.104 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56190B93.6040707@apache.org> References: <56190B93.6040707@apache.org> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:48:08 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache replacement From: "donaldupre ." To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1130cc78a850210521c058fd --001a1130cc78a850210521c058fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please allow me to clarify. According to your suggestion, the contributors will be managed by Apache. The decision making will stay with Apache. But apache proved to fail in those aspects... About creating a derivative product, after reading so many comments and opinions online suggesting a merge of OO and LO, introducing a third player seems unreasonable. I'm not affiliated with such a company and just raised an innocent question. Regards, Don On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > donaldupre . wrote: > >> What does it take to buy back OpenOffice from Apache? >> I'm sure there are commercial entities that will be happy to develop it. >> > > Those entities can ask their employees to contribute to OpenOffice, and > help shape the project with their contributions. This addresses all items > in your list (then some of them are debatable, but I'm not going to discuss > them in detail). > > The license allows companies to create derivative products and choose > distribution terms for those, as Damjan noted. The trademark policy > regulates how a company can use the "OpenOffice" trademark in derivatives. > All information you need is available on, or from, the > http://openoffice.apache.org/ website. > > I'll just note that none of the actions you list is incompatible with > Apache: the company contributes their employees' time to the project and > profits by selling support, or additional services, or customized versions. > This is very common and successful in other Apache projects. If you have > contacts with interested companies, just ask them to come to this list and > start contributing! > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --001a1130cc78a850210521c058fd--