Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <560A44D4.4080902@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
References: <5604FB1F.9020802@apache.org>
	<5606D393.7070006@gmail.com>
	<5608F0B9.2060301@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
	<5609AC5E.4050709@apache.org>
	<560A44D4.4080902@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:03:31 +0300
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+ue2rVYWZo2geBLMBCB+sZUvqZqTGdaQD4ZuFfzGQ19Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: ComDev <dev@community.apache.org>
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi!

just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted
a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for
FOSDEM. ASF is the org that can make it a really successfull
DEVROOM and last year the feedback was asking for
something like this big time.

Not sure how to increase our chances of being accepted,
but would love any feedback on that.

Thanks,
Roman.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:59 AM, RA Stehmann
<anwalt@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote:
>>> as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at
>>> FOSDEM 2016.
>>
>> So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We
>> don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and
>> OpenOffice has always been granted one for years.
>
> Before your posting, I've no doubts, that Apache will get a booth at
> FOSDEM, if they ask for it. Especially, if they say, they will come with
> Apache OpenOffice.
>
> Apache is one of the major (and greatest ;-) ) projects in the Free
> Software world.
>
>>
>>> It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins
>>> FOSDEM with a booth.
>>
>> I was assuming/understanding that we would have sent both the OpenOffice
>> request (highly likely to be approved; but less important) and the ASF
>> request (new, so less likely; but more important). And that, if both
>> were approved, we would merge the tables, or if one was approved we
>> would share the table.
>
> We might get a problem, if both booths are granted, but in different
> places. It isn't a proper behavior to quit one of the booths in that case.
>
>>
>> So no doubt we would all be together, in any case; I thought we would
>> try and maximize the chance of getting a presence.
>>
>> It appears Daniel has already sent a request on behalf on the ASF
>> (deadline is in November) but I haven't seen it at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 or on the
>> lists, so I have no idea about the contents. I just want to be sure that
>> the ASF at large, and OpenOffice as part of it, get a presence under
>> whatever name; and that we maximize our chances to be at FOSDEM.
>>
>
> Perhaps we should make a conditional request. But the best thing would
> be, that Daniel ask the orga sufficiently early before the deadline.
> They are all nice human beings.
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org