Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Message-ID: <560EC62E.8050906@wtnet.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:00:14 +0200
From: Marcus <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de;
 rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit Linux builds for 4.1.2
References: <560BA499.2080008@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
 <560C6207.7020307@apache.org> <560EB31E.1070706@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <560EB31E.1070706@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 10/02/2015 06:38 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 01/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> RA Stehmann wrote:
>>> for testing 64 bit Linux builds are needed.
>>> Do we have any we can use for testing AOO 4.1.2?
>> We will. The idea is that
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>> will contain the full set, as if it was a normal release
>
> The URL above is now populated, after Infra fixed the remaining issues.
> So don't say it too loud for the time being (I'm not sure everything was
> uploaded correctly), but we do have a Release Candidate for Apache
> OpenOffice 4.1.2 ready.
>
> This will NOT be a version we vote on. It will be the version we use for
> preliminary QA.

when do you think we should talk a bit louder about the new builds? I 
mean, updating the blog post, updating the headline on the website, etc. ?

To announce it a bit more in the public can help to get a better test 
coverage.

> By the way, now we have a process that will hopefully reduce the time
> needed for uploading release candidates by an estimated factor of 20: in
> practice, from a few days to a few hours.

Great :-)

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org