Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C5D611BC1 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36401 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2014 19:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 36311 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2014 19:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 36300 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2014 19:39:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:39:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.129] (HELO homiemail-a51.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.129) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:39:39 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a51.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a51.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBCA2E805C; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (unknown [151.67.102.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a51.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 112802E8057; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53AF19E0.3070509@apache.org> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:39:12 +0200 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Code snippets from oooforum in AOO website? References: <538AFE39.5090007@laposte.net> <539119D8.3020205@pitonyak.org> <53916745.1080806@apache.org> <53921EC3.70405@laposte.net> <539CC127.7000201@apache.org> <539D95DA.1090700@pitonyak.org> <53AEBBDC.5090001@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jan i wrote: > Just because the dns name expires the site remains active, adressable by ip > addr. It's on shared hosting so one would still have to associate it to 207.7.148.2 in the hosts file or such, but indeed you make an important point; oooforum.org is three things: a domain, a website and content. As discussed earlier, the cleanest way to get the content is to get everything transferred to Apache, since that way we can avoid legal complexities. And indeed the site hosting can expire before or after the domain, so we have no clear deadline. > Getting a domain transferred needs a signature from the current domain > owner, whereas we can sign up for it now, and when it becomes available in > 5 month we automatically get it. I personally try to stay out of the domain squatting/reselling/pre-booking business since it's rather unclear to me in general. But here the issue is that indeed this transfer would concern only the oooforum.org domain name, no site and no content. So the best that could come from that is that we simply redirect oooforum.org to our official forum. But I believe that users are mostly concerned with saving the content in some form, so getting oooforum.org this way would not help with users' concerns. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org