Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5396B209.4020708@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:21:45 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= <jogischmidt@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE]: googletest is now available and can be used
References: <538C5BCB.1020408@gmail.com> <5392360D.8050807@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <5392360D.8050807@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 06/06/14 23:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 J�rgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Maybe some volunteers have interest to adapt further existing unit
>> tests, the idea is to migrate all existing tests from cppunit to
>> gtest. ...
>> [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Googletest
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125003
> 
> Why isn't this in a blog post? It is interesting, modern, suitable for
> new volunteers... it has everything to go there. I mean, of course we
> need to track this in Bugzilla and document it on the wiki, but neither
> of these two tools (or the dev list, for that matter) is effective for
> outreach. Nice things should be more visible.

well it is not really spectacular, it is simply the replacement of
something we had before and we don't have migrated a lot of test by now.
Just a few and still a lot of work is necessary. But the main purpose
for me at the moment is to make it useable for the new OOXML framework
from the beginning.

But on the other hand it's time for a new blog post, I will see ...

Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org