Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 234FB10053 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96755 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2014 18:08:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 96668 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2014 18:08:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 96658 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2014 18:08:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:08:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 84.46.103.120 as permitted sender) Received: from [84.46.103.120] (HELO mail-smtp-ng-out-4b.wtnet.de) (84.46.103.120) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:08:09 +0000 Received: from bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (mail-cust-ng-in-2.wtnet.de [84.46.103.102] (may be forged)) by bc2-blade7.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s55I7q48018013 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:07:52 +0200 X-WT-Originating-IP: 46.59.228.19 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (CM-POP8-19.catv.wtnet.de [46.59.228.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s55I7fKg005750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:07:45 +0200 Message-ID: <5390B1ED.1020104@wtnet.de> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:07:41 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: propose a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release as next release References: <53905EF9.4010009@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53905EF9.4010009@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 06/05/2014 02:13 PM, schrieb J�rgen Schmidt: > Hi, > > over the last weeks we have seen some bugs that seems to be serious > enough to provide a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release. Well this is at least my > opinion and I would like to volunteer again to manage such a bugfix > release as acting release manager. > > The issue 124985 [1] can be seen as a meta issue where we have started > to collect potential candidates for a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release. > > If nobody has bigger concerns or arguments against such a bugfix release > we can continue with a more detailed planning, like schedule, > milestones, QA, detailed selection/proposing of blocker issues etc. OK, then I'll publish my suggestion for a detailed release plan tomorrow or Saturday. > I would like to keep the effort minimal because the main work should go > into a future release 4.2? It really depends what we can achieve when, > you all noticed the ongoing OOXML project that we drive and we will not > enable this work when we are not satisfied that it is a good alternative > and replacement for what we have today ;-) > > But before we continue I would like to hear other opinions. +1. When I look only on the severity with the picture lost/crashes problem and the number of issues for the mouse scrolling problem on Mac, then a bugfix release is worthwhile. And when more issues could be fixed even better. Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org