Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 014D2C1BC for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78387 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2014 12:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 78300 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2014 12:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 78289 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2014 12:14:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.46] (HELO mail-wg0-f46.google.com) (74.125.82.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:14:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so766216wgh.17 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NakUjChhTRjc0DROBRSgQwlSdJwhkg1jjVkce3T7B/Q=; b=TDUaZ86BacsW4+aNTEgVKCq06ZzaNS3IFXsAfrUrXUZoEUUGjMbfegLK0U5nZ15+cf WQ1QgizH8YCqUbFbEDCsFOY45aMt4SltHChEEpQ8J0TSjec0n0z/piudU424w7mJyWMN Z8AxtY8Eqz6CgJfxJLoDABOWPUZ75s5l3N/o+dJRM9+e5YUgTcOT6K56wrfaFqpYm0T/ 4EA4X7xWYC68lXybYBGUZH/L9zYf35t3+5mCAHnVc8eMt3BKNsZlF7AGtb6wh2Zdi37s u8bJsO3zQU9qmuOzE/5o582GvwQzfxCyMKs8k7395okepbHuL5xwnPj95xlbntu9gkaj WuEg== X-Received: by 10.195.12.34 with SMTP id en2mr82313077wjd.13.1401970424696; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.75] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gu2sm32607850wib.14.2014.06.05.05.13.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53905EF9.4010009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:13:45 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev Subject: [RELEASE]: propose a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release as next release X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, over the last weeks we have seen some bugs that seems to be serious enough to provide a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release. Well this is at least my opinion and I would like to volunteer again to manage such a bugfix release as acting release manager. The issue 124985 [1] can be seen as a meta issue where we have started to collect potential candidates for a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release. If nobody has bigger concerns or arguments against such a bugfix release we can continue with a more detailed planning, like schedule, milestones, QA, detailed selection/proposing of blocker issues etc. I would like to keep the effort minimal because the main work should go into a future release 4.2? It really depends what we can achieve when, you all noticed the ongoing OOXML project that we drive and we will not enable this work when we are not satisfied that it is a good alternative and replacement for what we have today ;-) But before we continue I would like to hear other opinions. Juergen [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124985 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org