Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04638103FB for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33420 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2014 20:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33335 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2014 20:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33325 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2014 20:54:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 20:54:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.120.142.151] (HELO mail1.mail.iol.ie) (193.120.142.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 20:54:09 +0000 Received: from (100AkerWood) [109.78.139.242] by mail1.mail.iol.ie with smtp id 1WrZEp-0001UE-4M; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:53:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:53:45 +0100 From: Rory O'Farrell To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Code snippets from oooforum in AOO website? Message-Id: <20140602215345.38bc72d97b8586451fc1494d@iol.ie> In-Reply-To: <538CDA18.1060601@apache.org> References: <538AFE39.5090007@laposte.net> <538B9263.4050303@laposte.net> <538CDA18.1060601@apache.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:10:00 +0200 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 01/06/2014 Hagar Delest wrote: > > Le 01/06/2014 16:51, Rob Weir a =E9crit : > >> Is it possible to approach the operator of oooforum.org and discuss > >> this? ... > > Then we are at a dead end... > > We already had this kind of discussion in November 2011. Since I doubt > > we can reach Ed, this is a lost cause. >=20 > It's very good that you have a backup available. As for being able to=20 > re-upload it, if you think that we have better chances if we contact=20 > oooforum "officially" on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice project, we can= =20 > of course do so. If there are personal or confidential data involved,=20 > that you don't want to post in public, you can use private AT=20 > openoffice.apache.org >=20 > > I tried to get the terms of use but oooforum cannot be reached anymore. >=20 > It's still alive but almost unreachable. Our official forum at=20 > forum.openoffice.org is indeed in much, much better shape and if we get=20 > all needed permissions we can repost the content there. >=20 > Regards, > Andrea. >=20 I have sent some contact info to the above address. I don't know if it is s= till valid, but it has phone numbers and mail address. --=20 Rory O'Farrell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org