openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <>
Subject Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:27:26 GMT
Am 06/06/2014 01:10 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On 06/05/2014 03:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 06/05/2014 01:03 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> On 30/05/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>> The both download buttons have now a hover over effect. They are
>>>> displayed inverted.
>>>> So, what do think is better as permanent design?
>>>> - Go back as it was before:
>>>> Light background, dark border, dark text
>>> This is highly subjective, but this version looks nicer. It's a bit
>>> confusing to see both buttons change color when one hovers on one of
>>> them, so I would be for removing the hovering effect on buttons (still
>>> keep it on the outer div) and have them always in the "dark text light
>>> background" version.
>> sure both buttons should react independent of each other. I've fixed this.
>> Regarding the styling, this is indeed really a question of taste. To see
>> the difference maybe better, I've styled both buttons different.
>> @All:
>> Please look again and decide then. I would go with the majority of
>> opinions.
> I'm looking at this page and I hope it's the right version:


> I don't know if there's much benefit to the hovering on the main areas,
> but I do like the background changes on the individual buttons in the
> download area.

OK, it's just that I need some opinions especially for this as I don't 
know what's looking better.


>>> For the rest, really impressive improvements!
> yes...I know this will solve a lot of our download issues.
>> Thanks.
>>> Of course there are some unavoidable issues (like Mac-32 Hebrew 4.1.0
>>> recommends 4.0.1 that sends you back to the former choice instead of
>>> sending you to the Mac-64 version), but the user experience is better
>>> than the current one.
>> Just to let this not uncommented:
>> It is possible to catch also this and other special cases. But it would
>> increase the complexity of the scripting. And I want to avoid this.
>>> I wouldn't offer version 3.4.1 from that page (so keep it as it is).
>> I see the argument that it is the last stable release of the 3.x series.
>> So, could make sense to have it in the version list instead of pointing
>> somewhere to the archive.
>> Marcus

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message