Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-40762-apmail-openoffice-dev-archive=openoffice.apache.org@openoffice.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A11610581
	for <apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:27:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11785 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 20:27:01 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11710 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 20:27:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.openoffice.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11699 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2013 20:27:00 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:27:00 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.179] (HELO mail-ea0-f179.google.com)
 (209.85.215.179)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:26:55 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b10so1117032eae.10
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=OpA8HqXxFAriLvKbyWtxKcf1FXBnVhv01hlWfmf5mt4=;
        b=PyPYfsmnhZX4VP0uZN1liSP0sG+re/9KIUmE56H9XYFJUObC2KjrQTx2K2utNb9bxD
         4EhVkTTd3DDy0i9KS6vjtdJeYY2E+37NvvgVPk7EVgSCyadZuiUymrW1Ks/lB9L/bSpF
         1ctlqfp2jhaEqT69B2/2wn2G90eTWFelWUOo+PRYLpJov+v//jnv0Bgi2fd718yL/ySd
         jWGYmd4cy9SMyf/5mpAXdzdrTAMVsDEX2yatBBlzTkgfxouOK+x//1jGFv8zVDdKF0V5
         b5F98nRUwU35ShESSu1D7wYw442oJvOQ+KQzDaSHmnY/Vge2fIV4NwdcWBalK2ZmvoJf
         diTw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.210.8 with SMTP id t8mr20717155eeo.39.1377203194114; Thu,
 22 Aug 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: acolorado@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.14.137 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:26:34 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nXKmrgTVNfmM2sSALLZWRnbp9bw
Message-ID: 
 <CAMK9kThXac21KDMmN4t-uYv-T7wCoqFWfXRA4pT3LpdaCxoPHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Wiki logo update
From: Alexandro Colorado <jza@oooes.org>
To: dev <dev@openoffice.apache.org>,
	OpenOffice Marketing <marketing@openoffice.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b603fe22b5d5304e48f1b80
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--047d7b603fe22b5d5304e48f1b80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Since the whole consensus process is completely broken, I would like to
just get a final confirmation if there a 'go' on the Wiki logo update which
was reverted due to a regression by infra when setting the SVN.

It has been aproximately 400 since the issue was raised on bugzilla and ML.

The bug with the new logo is here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122998

-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

--047d7b603fe22b5d5304e48f1b80--