Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90699107BD for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55543 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 21:32:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 55454 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 21:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 55439 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2013 21:32:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:32:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-ee0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:32:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l10so1191741eei.35 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:31:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fnvTGMbpeD4VG5wduCfq8Nj/bvq4TtqlFA0cvjorEmo=; b=T8pFMbdGKTzZUcWX3FUyQVMDw8MnSAqa3J4RVmJTqZqzNokAM3POczVQALzlEOaQEE mUymC5M7Klj1h6Fy2KlgBrzfQvXReErdatezEBaaCAbvoMDH0L0RLPDa6mysql/SetKP cN84C5N7q160amNK94Cp3njEIwXRhn4jLEPWByfVisNYtRuBEXj8qvcJN97mNfsw/xjK hqAVavYNkoRJhRY38/OqmSQgo1bSDhUKQ0ea9NxQaQtWHCArGs6rT0CyNMWbdsRcc7a0 0YjED3HOgapZpAB6GFiiGB4h0pnQd9+YeRUJlzQPaIztxBsnGbqtbZ33+y2nCUCwUroi 8YEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.64.1 with SMTP id n1mr21498074eex.15.1377207103714; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acolorado@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.14.137 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:31:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52168031.7070400@oracle.com> References: <52168031.7070400@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:31:43 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: r-tSQxpkf9gu3LemGJcmT66O9cw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wiki logo update From: Alexandro Colorado To: dev Cc: OpenOffice Marketing Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1132f09433285c04e49004cb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1132f09433285c04e49004cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Andrew Rist wrote= : > > On 8/22/2013 1:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> Since the whole consensus process is completely broken, I would like to >> just get a final confirmation if there a 'go' on the Wiki logo update >> which >> was reverted due to a regression by infra when setting the SVN. >> >> It has been aproximately 400 since the issue was raised on bugzilla and >> ML. >> >> The bug with the new logo is here: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=3D122998 >> > I went and looked at the bug, and there are a number of images attached. > Which one is the Wiki Logo you are proposing? > =E2=80=8BThe one that says "Header for Wiki" the rest are for forum.=E2=80= =8B > I was actually disappointed a bit that I didn't see something like the > logo at > http://forum.openoffice.org/**en/forum/download/file.php?id=3D** > 17705&mode=3Dview > which I thought was very promising. > =E2=80=8BThat is a different discussion, like I mentioned before, consistan= t branding is not only about drawing a logo but about a whole HTML/CSS revamp of different sites. Not something you can just draw, but rather change the structure of the different systems (mediawiki, phpBB, plain HTML and Drupal).=E2=80=8B And reskin them with the same look and feel, something th= at we need to agree upon. But not now, we just want to switch the logo at this moment to the current AOO 4 one. > > One question I have is: Why do we have the light blue background? I thin= k > that looks much better and more consistent with the general site in white= : > http://forum.openoffice.org/**en/forum/download/file.php?id=3D** > 17720&mode=3Dview > =E2=80=8BThe site design was never really agreed, we inherit the design fro= m Oracle (2 years ago). Now a new design is being done by the Extension/Template web team and the trend is to adopt it from the even older 'twirl design' that was done back in 2008. This concern should be address to Roberto Galopinni who seems to be in charge of that design. > > > >> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --=20 Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org --001a1132f09433285c04e49004cb--