Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7338B1004A for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66678 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2013 20:18:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 66611 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2013 20:18:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 66603 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2013 20:18:43 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:18:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username jani, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:18:42 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u10so1781879lbi.14 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:18:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4L/6Zu6bbkFmIL+eKEifx7gMGnxu8RiChkS73/8dkN4=; b=YmeoMkYXJc5GH5hqW/NLGR35xrKKNVmXXgzQbULtR8dhFum0HGTga7YIYqEjxlA1zq 0nbgpg3r3+529UOPG7OHwp50zWSFGWt8DevmwQ+h9nFyQj9/oGntOXwgzUQrJD2tX0/m FrJPMEflqjmA85/2PoUzD5EH1tJ3LHYk+pAoBLn1ZWiXbsFH2lzwhBBZPENqGl09VKG0 CCKbVGqtgJBdP50YLlOx6TtAkzySBPBinLt4IfThSC7Y76EK1w2BweQIfg5CjJ5JwWdO EsjvHyqeG7CeVY+In3p7WU7S852eED2iYeyiPD1KgPH17R/1vEPrhhLRMpWC5N/NnBOF HUNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.116.7 with SMTP id js7mr10373450lab.11.1377461920715; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.141.167 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:18:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5219C964.4010100@apache.org> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:18:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Font galleries facelift From: janI To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2672a79d65004e4cb5834 --001a11c2672a79d65004e4cb5834 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 25 August 2013 22:14, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Ricardo Berlasso > wrote: > > 2013/8/25 Andrea Pescetti > > > >> Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> > >>> I wonder if OpenOffice could get a facelift on the fonts it comes up > with. > >>> I have seen quite a few of Apache license fonts that are pretty nice > >>> > >> > >> Within reason (we cannot include too many fonts) and within license > >> limitations (Apache 2 being the easiest one to integrate) we could > include > >> a few more fonts. > >> > >> Droid aside, do you have a short list of specific fonts (with download > >> links and license information) worth integrating? > >> > > > > > > Beside Droid and the fonts we already include (arimo, tinos, etc) it's > not > > easy to find Apache licensed fonts: most opensource fonts use SIL > license. > > > > It should be possible to include nearly any open source font with the > *binaries*, but I don't really see the point. Unless one of our > document templates actually uses the fonts, we're just adding clutter > to the user's machine. And if we do use the new fonts from the > templates then we would be introducing an interop issue, since those > documents would not render perfectly with older OpenOffice version, > where these new fonts would be missing. > > IMHO, if we really think that new fonts are needed, then it would be > better to do it in the form of a resource-only extension, with fonts > and templates. That extension could then be installed on AOO 4.0 > systems, but also earlier systems. > +1 thats a good compatible way of doing it, with the advantage that our big dist. does not get bigger. rgds jan I. > Regards, > > -Rob > > > > On this page > > > > http://www.google.com/fonts/attribution > > > > there is a list of google fonts with their license. Of interest and with > > Apache license I can only see Open Sans and Open Sans Condensed > > > > http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans > > http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans+Condensed > > > > that are quite similar to Adobe's Source Sans Pro (which is SIL > licensed), > > the Noto family > > > > http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Noto+Sans > > http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Noto+Serif > > > > and not many more: Most other Apache fonts there are only "decorative". > > > > Note that I do not use those fonts on a regular basis (I'm a big fan of > > Libertine/Biolinum family that are dual licensed SIL+GPL with font > > exception), so I cannot say how good they are. > > > > But if we can include SIL licensed fonts on the search, it will be quite > > difficult to choose only a few :) > > > > Regards > > Ricardo > > > > > > > > > >> See https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122097< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122097>for an example of a > similar enhancement issue. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Andrea. > >> > >> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org< > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --001a11c2672a79d65004e4cb5834--