Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64008102C6 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86728 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2013 23:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 86668 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2013 23:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 86660 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2013 23:17:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dgerard@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.179] (HELO mail-ve0-f179.google.com) (209.85.128.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:17:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c13so1772226vea.38 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=92y3oZfztoqxkUnk+z1v+Cnu6Z8XFqiIEz34UU2XxBM=; b=ytGgr5o5Vy+AOcq/jQxPlXCVBcjgOTQ+He+HBDuwDxydDsrHAHEPuUi+uLfNLKirh7 H/qOX1f25ZUIzPtj0XjZ5eOBwqFzqbMRCgFVtHoECK4yXcnI+rNhF3yDGbyZCCMR3U4K miS04lU2F19D32AEFkW89KmO4yORAqWGa36tIIpH+6erxtwFlnecI4wLeLly7sg3GZhq LtHEURziwbo8q/pdD6Xsrs6t28RHOWu9pxsebkhhXarVUzYzc4CG6Lyba7ibdeYg7VmK MdOb9SVPYqlvIEISU/pjxTqhzQqn0qaV4uHfyY5KIGXRqHd36DqCCMBHlEGwrV06aOmg Jt2w== X-Received: by 10.52.0.108 with SMTP id 12mr146007vdd.45.1377904607374; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.226.166 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:16:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Gerard Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 00:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Yet another flyer To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 30 August 2013 23:17, Rob Weir wrote: > Trademarks apply to a specific class of product. There is no other > OpenOffice, Apache OpenOffice or OpenOffice.org that is a software > application. This is why the jobs website Monster.com can exist > along with Monster Cables, or Apple Records can exist along with Apple > Computer. So long as we use the full name at first use for clarity, > we should feel free to use the shorter form in the rest of the > document. This has been our practice on the website, press releases, > documentation, etc. http://openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie Are you quite sure this applies? I presume Apache legal have in fact done some hard thinking on this point. - d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org