Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9969010B25 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98919 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2013 16:55:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 98442 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2013 16:55:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 98434 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2013 16:55:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 16:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.5] (HELO homiemail-a68.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 16:55:47 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a68.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a68.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97980400F6B1B; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [151.67.111.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a68.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7664400F6B13; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52027BE7.4020406@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:55:03 +0200 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows References: <5201FAE0.8010107@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <5201FAE0.8010107@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows. > On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized > that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (Java 5) or JDK 1.6 (Java 6) > for Windows. Thus, I decided to go with JDK 1.7. The resulting AOO > installation on Windows no longer works together with an JRE 6. It does > not recognize an installed JRE 6 as an valid Java runtime environment. May we frame the problem in more technical terms, just to know what is broken? For example, why is this affecting only Windows and why is Java 6 not recognized in your build? Could the problem be in detection rather than in the actual compatibility? Java issues were extensively discussed in earlier times, so here's a quick summary that also answers most of the questions in this thread: - As of 4.0, OpenOffice can be built with Java 5, 6 or 7 - Whatever you use for building, the resulting binary has a "Java baseline" of 1.5 as per http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Policies/Java_Usage (means: runs with Java 5, 6 or 7) - We built 4.0 with Java 6 (on Linux at least; not 100% sure about other platforms) In general, I agree that we should build on the most secure platform available. But, based on the above, what is the relationship between "building on Java 7" and "running on Java 6"? To reuse Rob's Windows XP argument, sure we should build on a supported (by Microsoft) Windows version, but, if at all possible/reasonable, we shouldn't break compatibility with Windows XP. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org